LightBlog

lundi 26 septembre 2022

You might not have to wait too long to get your hands on the Pixel Watch

Google will officially showcase the Pixel Watch alongside its flagship Pixel 7 series at a hardware launch event early next month. However, the company is struggling to keep its first smartwatch under wraps until the event. Over the last few weeks, we’ve seen several reports highlighting key details about the Pixel Watch. Now, a new leak has given us a first look at its retail box.

A recent post on Reddit showcases an image of the Pixel Watch retail box reportedly captured at a Target distribution center. As you can see in the attached image, the Pixel Watch will come in a small rectangular box, unlike the retail box for recent smartwatches from Samsung and Apple. It will feature a colorful ‘G’ logo on the front, along with Google Pixel Watch branding, and an image of the smartwatch itself. In addition, the box features “with Fitbit” branding.

Google Pixel Watch retail box leak.

Credit: u/xXavi3rx

Since Google has already confirmed all these details in the past, the retail box itself doesn’t tell us anything new. But given that the image was captured at a distribution center, we believe the Pixel Watch could go on sale shortly after next month’s Made By Google event. In contrast, recent leaks suggest that the Pixel 7 series would go on sale on October 18, twelve days after the official announcement.

If you’re thinking of picking up a Pixel Watch following the announcement next month, you should know that it will reportedly pack an Exynos 9110 chipset, a 300mAh battery, and LTE connectivity. Leaks say Google will offer it in three case colors, Black, Silver, and Gold, with a host of first-party bands and straps. In addition, we’ve learned that the Pixel Watch would retail for $349.99 for the base Bluetooth-only model and $399.99 for the LTE variant.

Will you be ordering a Pixel Watch after Google’s launch event next month? Why or why not? Let us know in the comments section below.


Source: Reddit

The post You might not have to wait too long to get your hands on the Pixel Watch appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/sDl2Nqz
via IFTTT

dimanche 25 septembre 2022

Amazfit GTR 4 review: A stylish watch with good battery life

For many shoppers, the choice between smartwatches comes down to two big players — Apple and Samsung. On one side you have the Apple Watch and the Galaxy Watch making up more than half of the smartwatch market. And on the other side, there are brands like Amazfit. Granted Amazfit hasn’t had a flawless run in the past, but their last few smartwatches have been great, particularly for the price. The company’s new Amazfit GTR 4 — which I’ve spent several days with — is no exception. It’s a great alternative to some of the best smartwatches out there and it is a great watch that puts this brand under the spotlight.

XDA Recommended Award Badge
The Amazfit GTR 4 does lack proper app support and doesn’t let you interact well with the incoming notifications. However, it makes for up for those shortcomings with a fantastic design, good battery life, and reliable activity tracking. You also get some other thoughtful additions like the ability to make and receive calls directly on the watch, Alexa support, and more. And all of this is done at a price that doesn’t break the bank. If all those features sound convincing to you then I suggest you continue reading because I’ve got a lot more details for you in this GTR 4 review. Let’s dive in!

Navigate this review:

Amazfit GTR 4: Pricing and Availability

The Amazfit GTR 4 is now available to purchase in the US for $200, making it cheaper than the latest offerings from the likes of Apple and Samsung. There are some solid alternatives to the Amazfit GTR 4 in this price range in the US, but we’ll get to those towards the end of this review. The GTR 4 is also available to purchase in Asian markets including in India where it’s available for just ₹16,999 (~$201). That makes it significantly cheaper than the top-of-the-line Galaxies and the Apple Watches in that particular market.

    Amazfit GTR 4
    The Amazfit GTR 4 gets a lot of things right for its $199 asking price in the US. It may not have all the bells and whistles, but it offers all the staples to be worthy of consideration.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Specifications

Here’s a quick look at the specifications of the Amazfit GTR 4 smartwatch:

Specification Amazfit GTR 4
Build
  • Tempered glass on the display
  • Aluminum alloy middle frame
  • Glossy PC bottom shell
Dimensions & Weight
  • 46 x 46 x 12.4mm
    • 34 grams without a strap
Display
  • 1.43-inch AMOLED
  • 466 x 466 pixels, 326PPI
Sensors
  • Health
    • BioTracker 4.0 PPG Biometric sensor with support for blood oxygen.
  • Movement
    • Acceleration sensor, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic, air pressure, and ambient light sensor
  • Connection
    • WLAN 2.4GHz, Bluetooth 5.0
  • Positioning
    • Dual-band positioning
    • Circularly-polarized antenna technology
Supported platforms
  • Android 7.0 and above
  • iOS 12.0 and above
Battery & Charging
  • 475mAh battery
  • Magnetic charger
Application Zepp app
Other Features
  • Water resistance up to 5ATM
  • Bluetooth calling
  • Built-in speakers
  • Microphones

About this review: Amazfit loaned me this GTR 4 sample unit for testing. This review was written after spending about two weeks with the watch. Amazfit did not have any input in this review.


Design and Display

  • The Amazfit GTR 4 has a beautiful design that gives it a premium look and feel.
  • It sports a responsive and crisp-looking AMOLED panel on the front. It also supports an always-on display.

The Amazfit GTR 4 hardware is excellent. It both looks and feels like it’s built to compete with more expensive smartwatches on the market. It also has a thin and lightweight body which makes it more comfortable to wear than the Amazfit T-Rex 2 which I reviewed not too long ago. Sadly, I can’t say the same about the comfort of the included rubber band though. It started to feel uncomfortable on my wrist within a day or two. Now I just remove the watch every few hours and let my skin breathe before putting it back on. I noticed that it was also quick to pick up sweat marks, so you may have to clean it quite often.

The Amazfit GTR 4 hardware is excellent.

This wasn’t the case with the bands that came with the Amazfit T-Rex 2, so it could very well be an issue with my unit this time. Thankfully, the bands are easily changeable via the standard watch spring bar mechanism with which you can attach any 22mm watch bands you like. The back of the watch is where all your sensors rest. There are quite a few of them on this smartwatch, so there’s a slight bulge to go with the sensors and the two tiny metal contacts for charging. There’s a button on the side along with an Apple Watch-esque digital crown that helps you navigate the UI with subtle haptic feedback.

The body of the GTR 4 is made out of an aluminum alloy and it gives it a very premium fit and finish. The watch is available in two finishes, both of which look better than the last-gen GTR 3 smartwatch, in my opinion. As for durability, the Amazfit GTR 4 comes with a 5 ATM water-resistant rating. There’s also tempered glass on top of the display which is holding quite well.

The display on the GTR 4 makes it feel like you're using a high-end watch.

The face of the watch has an AMOLED panel which looks pretty great. In fact, the display on this watch is one of those things that makes it feel like you’re using a high-end device. It displays crisp visuals and it’s just as responsive as many other premium smartwatches I’ve used in the past. It also gets bright enough to be used outdoors under direct sunlight, which is something you’d appreciate if you spend a lot of time outdoors.

The GTR 4 also supports the always-on display feature that shows the time and some other watch complications, while keeping the rest of the display dark. Turning this feature on triggers a battery drain warning, but more on that topic in the sections below. What I like most about the watch is how responsive and accurate its raise to wake feature is. It’s an underrated feature that just feels right when it works well. I’ve only seen work reliably on some premium smartwatches, but the GTR 4 gets it right.


Software and tracking features

  • The Amazfit GTR 4 runs Zepp OS and connects to the Zepp app on Android and iOS.
  • The Zepp OS offers a lot of features but it comes with very limited app support.
  • The GTR 4 can track a lot of activities and health metrics including heart rate, sleep, stress, and blood oxygen levels.

The Amazfit GTR 4 runs the company’s own ‘Zepp OS 2.0’ rather than Google’s Wear OS. I got a taste of this particular OS while using the T-Rex 2, and it’s very basic but functional. What I love the most about Zepp OS is how delightfully simple it is to use. You’ll get used to this software in no time if you’re coming from a different smartwatch.

What I love the most about Zepp OS is how delightfully simple it is to use.

It doesn’t have all the bells and whistles that you’d get with other Wear OS options but it offers a lot of useful features and handles the basic tasks well enough to not make you seek an alternative. The watch connects and syncs with your smartphone via the ‘Zepp’ app. This particular application likes both iPhones and Android phones equally, meaning you’re not going to miss out on any features for picking sides. The GTR 4 had no issues connecting to my Galaxy S22 and the iPhone 12 during my time with it.

The Amazfit GTR 4 likes both iPhones and Android phones equally.

The connected app lets you select which applications can send notifications to your watch. All notifications were mirrored to my watch almost instantly, and I faced no connectivity issues throughout my usage either. The watch doesn’t give you a lot of options to interact with the notifications though. And that, in my opinion, is one of the bigger downsides of Zepp OS. Replies to messages, for instance, rely on preset messages, which is not intuitive.

There’s no way to type or dictate custom responses, which is very inconvenient. I always find myself simply hitting the ‘Delete’ button to clear the notifications or reaching out to my phone to respond. This is one of my biggest gripes with the T-Rex 2 smartwatch too, and sadly it’s no different here. Similarly, the app selection is once again rather bleak on the Zepp OS. The lack of Google support really shows here as you only get a thin selection of apps to install and use on your smartwatch. Zepp OS offers all the basic apps to get the job done, but it’s a clear step down for power users due to the weak app support.

Zepp OS offers all the basic apps to get the job done, but it's a clear step down for power users due to weak app support.

Some other noteworthy features of the GTR 4 include support for Alexa and Bluetooth calling, both of which I didn’t use all that much throughout my usage. It’s worth mentioning that the Bluetooth calling feature uses the watch’s built-in speakers, so you can’t really make or receive calls in public unless you’re comfortable with that. The GTR 4 cannot connect to Bluetooth earbuds when we tried to pair some to it.

The Amazfit GTR 4 comes with support for more than 150 activities which makes it on par with a lot of fitness trackers out there. If you are the type of person who likes to work out and track your activities, then the GTR 4 will definitely keep up with your needs. Additionally, the watch can also keep tabs on other metrics like sleep, heart rate, blood oxygen, and stress levels. Amazfit is using a BioTracker 4.0 PPG Biometric sensor on the GTR 4, which is better than the one used on the T-Rex 2.

The step tracking itself was largely accurate for the most part and I didn’t notice any ghost steps being recorded. The watch can also detect activity and start logging it as a workout. It gives you an alert with a timer before recording it as a workout just to give you that control to deny if it ends up detecting by mistake or marking it as something else.

What I didn’t find that reliable, however, is its ability to log how many times I stood up during the day. This can quickly become annoying too because it keeps sending notifications asking you to stand during the day when you just did. The key to making this work properly is by standing up and actually walking around for a bit to let the watch detect an activity.

The companion app on your smartphone acts as a hub that lets you access all the data. Navigating around this app is just as easy as doing it on the watch. The app itself has a pretty clean UI, giving you a detailed breakdown of each activity and health metric that is being tracked. You can also use the app to tweak your watch settings, download new apps, change your watch face, and more. And for those that care, Amazfit also lets you sync workout data with apps such as Adidas Running and Strava.


Battery life

  • The GTR 4 has a 475mAh battery that can easily last you for around two weeks on a single charge.
  • The battery takes 1 hour and 45 minutes to fully charge using the included magnetic charger.

The Amazfit GTR 4 packs a 475mAh battery inside its chassis, which lasts me for about ten days on a single charge. It’s not quite the 14-day battery life that Amazfit promised me with the watch, but I have to admit that I’ve also been using it quite heavily. I’ve set the GTR 4 to record my heart rate and stress levels every five minutes. Additionally, I’ve enabled high/low heart rate warnings, assisted sleep monitoring, and stress relief reminders. And as I mentioned previously, I am also the GTR 4’s always-on display feature, which is perhaps the biggest catalyst for battery drain.

The fact that the GTR 4 is dropping only around 10-percent battery every day with all these features enabled is quite commendable. The T-Rex 2 definitely had better battery life, but the GTR 4 is relatively thinner and is a more traditional-looking watch. It also lasts longer than any other Galaxy Watch or the Apple Watch out there, which is a huge advantage in my books. Not having to charge the GTR 4 every day makes you start thinking of it as a regular watch that you never have to charge. It’s great. It takes about 1 hour and 45 minutes to fully charge it when it’s dead. That’s not really a lot of time to devote to something that you only have to do maybe twice or thrice a month. Not to mention, you can always get more usage out of it, if you don’t use it as heavily as I do.


Should you buy the Amazfit GTR 4?

The Amazfit GTR 4 gets a lot of things right, especially for its asking price which makes it cheaper than the top dogs in the market. It’s a no-brainer for those who are on a strict budget and want a smartwatch that they don’t have to charge every day. It may not offer all the bells and whistles like the Galaxy Watch 5 and the Apple Watch Series 8, but the GTR 4 does enough to keep you active and monitor the important metrics including blood oxygen, sleep, heart rate, and more.

The lack of Google support and a good family of applications may stick out like a sore thumb to advanced users, but Amazfit has managed to make the GTR 4 last longer between the charges by focusing on the core smartwatch features and basic functionalities. I see this working well for those who only need a smartwatch for passive use cases like fitness tracking and checking notifications.

You should buy the Amazfit GTR 4 if:

  • You want a good-looking smartwatch without having to spend top dollars.
  • You want a smartwatch that you don’t have to charge every day.
  • You’re on a tight budget and want something that works well with both Android and iOS devices.

You shouldn’t buy the Amazfit GTR 4 if:

  • You want to respond and interact with incoming notifications directly on the watch.
  • You want a smartwatch with a good application ecosystem.
    Amazfit GTR 4
    The Amazfit GTR 4 gets a lot of things right for its $199 asking price in the US. It may not have all the bells and whistles, but it offers all the staples to be worthy of consideration.

Overall, I wouldn’t pass the GTR 4 as an advanced smartwatch to replace the more expensive options. However, it does most of the job well enough to be worthy of consideration. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 is a solid alternative to consider, but it doesn’t last as long as the GTR 4, and it doesn’t work with iOS devices. Similarly, the Apple Watch SE is limited to just a single platform and doesn’t have things like an always-on display.

Amazfit has come a long way from its early days. The GTR 4 is easily one of the best watches the brand has ever made and it shows how its smartwatches have equally evolved through the years. These smartwatches are definitely getting better with each iteration and I am excited to see what their next smartwatch brings to the table.

The post Amazfit GTR 4 review: A stylish watch with good battery life appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/qRxeyHv
via IFTTT

Acer Aspire Vero (14-inch) review: A unique eco-friendly laptop

When you buy a laptop for prices close to $800, you often think about specifications and price more than anything else. Never on your mind is about how friendly your new laptop is to the environment. Or, if it’s using recycled materials and upcycled content. You just want one of the best laptops that feels premium, and will last.

Well, I was recently sent the Acer Aspire Vero for review, and after using it for a few weeks, I think it is on the other side of that story. It’s a plastic laptop and is definitely not a premium-feeling device at all. It shoves aside all the usual things I associate with the higher-end laptops that I tend to review. Instead, it is aiming to help save planet Earth. Coming with the Intel Core i7-1255U CPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD, it’s also decent performing for everyday tasks just like other laptops of its class and other budget Acer laptops.

Instead of putting the very best display specifications and build quality first, this is a laptop that’s all about sustainability. It’s even quite upgradable, too, which is a surprise for the price of $700. It might look cheap on the surface for good reason, but it’s still a great-performing laptop that you should consider if you really care about saving the planet.

    Acer Aspire Vero
    The Acer Aspire Vero is an all-plastic eco friendly laptop that's well performing thanks to Intel's U-series CPUs

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Navigate this review:

Acer Aspire Vero pricing and availability

  • The Acer Aspire Vero comes in eight different configurations on Acer.com and starts at $700
  • The 14-inch version I have for review is the highest-end model. It comes in priced at $900

You can buy the Acer Aspire Vero today in 14-inch or 15.6-inch sizes at Acer.com, or through partners like Walmart, Adorama, MicroCenter, Newegg, and Amazon. These retailers might have it cheaper than Acer.com. Acer suggests the starting price of $700 on its website, but Amazon will regularly have the laptop on sale.

There are a lot of different models you can choose from. The cheapest at $700 comes with a last-year 11th generation Intel Core i5-1155G7 CPU, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD. Adding more RAM and storage or picking a newer 12th-gen Intel Core i7 or Intel Core i5 CPU will bump your price up by a few hundred dollars, depending on the unit and screen size that you choose. Acer maxed out my model for $200 more off the base price. I got 16GB RAM, the Intel Core i7-1255U, and a 1TB SSD.

Acer Aspire Vero specs

Specs Additional Information
CPU
  • Intel Core i7-1255U processor (12 MB Smart Cache, 1.7 GHz performance-core with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 up to 4.7 GHz)
Graphics
  • Intel Iris Xe graphics
Display
  • 14-inch IPS, FHD 1920 x 1080, 300 nits, 16:9 aspect ratio
Dimensions & weight
  • 12.94 x 8.8 x 0.7 inches & 3.31 pounds
Memory
  • 16GB of LPDDR4 RAM
Storage
  • 1TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD
Battery
  • 56 Wh 3-cell Li-ion battery
Ports
  • 1 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4
  • 2 x USB-A
  • 1 x HDMI 2.1
  • DC-in for charger (optional)
  • 3.5 mm headphone and microphone jack
Audio & microphones
  • Acer TrueHarmony technology for lower distortion, wider frequency range, headphone-like audio, and powerful sound
  • Acer Purified.Voice technology with AI noise reduction in dual built-in microphones. Features include far-field pickup, dynamic noise reduction through neural network, adaptive beam forming, and pre-defined personal and conference call modes.
Connectivity
  • Intel Wireless Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  • 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax wireless LAN
  • Supports Bluetooth 5.2 and later
Camera
  • 1080p HD video at 60 fps with Temporal Noise Reduction
Color
  • Uses a paint-free chassis no colors are used
Material
  • Recycled materials
Biometrics
  • Windows Hello fingerprint reader on the trackpad
Upgradable components
  • Yes, RAM and SSD

Design: It is plastic, and eco-friendly

  • It is made of plastic and feels really cheap for a $900 laptop
  • There are a lot of recycled materials in use
  • You’ll find a ton of ports on the device

The highlight (and also the lowlight) of the Acer Aspire Vero is definitely this design. I am quite used to reviewing laptops that are made of aluminum, magnesium, and even metal. There’s none of that to be found on the exterior of this device. It’s for good reason, though. Acer wants to keep this laptop sustainable and make it look unique, but I am not a fan of it.

For the price of $900 that my unit costs, or even the $700 introduction price, I don’t see why anyone would want to buy a cheap-feeling plastic laptop like this one. That is unless you are eco-minded and want to contribute to a cleaner, greener earth. I think laptops are intended to be premium-feeling devices.

Anyway, as much as I hate plastic laptops, there’s a lot of cool stuff to this design which makes me want to give Acer a pass. Many laptop makers are now being more eco-friendly with laptop components. HP used ocean-bound plastics in the Dragonfly, for example. And Apple uses recycled aluminum in MacBook enclosures. Acer’s taking that to the next level in more ways than one — and in newer ways other laptop makers have not.

I first noticed this first with the chassis. Unlike ThinkPads or other devices, it is paint-free and has yellow and gray freckles everywhere. Acer says this can reduce the impact of VOCs released into the environment. It’s also made of post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic that’s eco-friendly and reduces landfill waste. Acer says that 50% of PCR plastic is used on the chassis, and 30% on the keycaps. Scrap material generated during production is also recycled and reused. All this helps reduce carbon emissions from making the laptop by 21%.

All of that is good, but it just feels terrible for something of this price. The laptop lid bends a lot, and pressing on the keyboard deck will make the deck bend. I never want to feel this in a laptop, especially since you can buy an all- aluminum device like a Lenovo Yoga 7i for this same price. If this was a $300 laptop, the range where you’d typically find plastic material, then I’d give Acer a pass.

This is quite a boxy laptop, too. It looks a lot more square than other Windows devices like a Lenovo ThinkPad. That’s why it’s quite thick at 0.7 inches and heavy at 3.3 pounds. Who would have thought plastic was this heavy?

There are two things about the design though — ports as well as the ability to service and upgrade. With the ports, there’s a lot to avoid dongles. The right side has a USB-A port. The left side is busy with a single Thunderbolt 4 port, HDMI, and another USB-A, then a headphone jack. That thick chassis is what likely allows Acer to include these ports.

As for the ways to upgrade. You can remove the back of the device with a regular screwdriver. That then gives access to the SSD for changing. It’s part of Acer’s vision for making this laptop reusable over time. I really like upgradability in a laptop, as it means you don’t have to stick to the specs you get at checkout.

Though I didn’t try it out, I could have swapped the SSD for another one and installed Windows from fresh. Even the internal components look easy to replace. The battery isn’t screwed or soldered down. The speakers are housed in the corners without glue, and you can easily tell which part of the laptop is for what purpose. I haven’t seen this modularity in a long time, and kudos to Acer!

Display and sound: Cramped, and dull, especially for this price

  • The 14-inch display feels cramped at times as it’s not a 16:10 aspect ratio display
  • The webcam is decent at 1080p and has software features to improve your image

When I used the Acer Aspire Vero for work, I was let down by the display. The color accuracy and brightness (it hits 267 nits of brightness) are alright but I hoped for better. For the record, it hits 70% of the Adobe RGB, 67% NTSC,  70% P3, and 92% sRGB according to my colorimeter.

These color gamuts are quite dull, especially the all-important Adobe RGB. It’s why I often found myself kicking the brightness up, to make sure scenes looked more vibrant. When I watched NASCAR highlights on YouTube with the display at a lower brightness, I missed out on a lot of things like the glimmer of the lights against the cars, or the build-up of fine rubber on the windshield. Even web browsing, the product photos I took for this review looked pretty dull on the screen if the brightness wasn’t up all the way. There’s just not a lot of contrast and black point for that.

Note that I also just came off reviewing both the HP Envy 16 and the HP ZBook Firefly G9 which have great displays. These laptops have newer 16:10 aspect ratio displays, and it made me forget about how terrible a 16:9 can be. I get that this laptop starts at $700, and a 16:10 display is considered premium, but I honestly wish that it was standard. 16:9 displays like this one feel way too cramped when I tried to open a lot of windows and try to multitask.

At least the webcam above the display is decent. It’s a 1080p webcam, at a time when most laptop makers are moving away from 720p. Other laptop makers are going with 5MP webcams, but 1080p is just alright. I don’t look blurry or washed out in my weekly Google Meet calls, and I think Acer’s Temporal Noise Reduction technology on board this laptop really helped.

Keyboard and trackpad: I hate the keyboard

  • The keyboard is squeaky and terrible
  • The reversed text on the “E” and “R” keycaps is a huge distraction
  • The trackpad is plastic and works very well

On the keyboard and trackpad, I have some mixed feelings. The keyboard is terrible, but the trackpad is great. I’m really let down by the keyboard for the $900 price. It’s something I expect from an entry-level laptop like an HP Stream.

When I typed my way through this review, the keyboard felt way too cheap. I heard a lot of squeaking in the keys as I typed. The enter key and the backslash keys are also way too close, and I found myself hitting one or the other by mistake a lot. Oh, and I get that Acer wants the user to know of this laptop being eco-friendly with the “E’ and “R” keys being yellow and reversed to mimic reduce and recycle, but it really led to too many typos. It’s a huge visual distraction!

The trackpad, though, isn’t all too bad. Like the rest of the laptop, it is also plastic, but it is smooth to the touch to resemble glass. That means it’s loud and makes a ton of noise when clicked. Even better is that Acer snuck a fingerprint reader into the trackpad. I was able to log into the Acer really quickly because of that.

Performance: The best part of this laptop

  • Intel’s 12th-gen U-series brings a lot of performance
  • Battery life is great, coming past 6 hours

The Acer Aspire Vero is powered by Intel’s 12th generation U-series chip. This sits at the bottom of the Intel pile behind the H-class CPUs that run at 45 watts, as well as the mid-powered P-class CPUs that run at 28 watts. It has 2 performance cories and 8 efficiency cores, running at 4.70 GHz max. The Intel Core-17-1255U in my unit that here runs at 15 watts, which is great for battery life.

Overall, I feel like this U-series chip hit the perfect balance for productivity and the main tasks that I use my laptop for. Connecting up to a 4K monitor and streaming 4K content didn’t slow this laptop down. Neither did my usual workflow of balancing out about 12 tabs in Microsoft Edge. Even light gaming worked well, with CS: GO running smoothly on medium settings, though it made the fans in the laptop go crazy.

Test run Acer Aspire Vero (Intel Core i7-1255u) Lenovo Yoga 7i (2022) Core i7-1255U Lenovo Yoga 9i Core i7-1260P Huawei MateBook 16S Core i7-12700H
PC Mark 10 5,482 5,453 5,616 5,501
3D Mark: Time Spy 1,786 1,774 1,678 1,957
Geekbench 5 (single/multi) 1,717/8552 1,694 / 8,370 1,736 / 9,525 1,779/ 9,789
Cinebench R23 (single/multi) 1,751/8068 1,763 / 7,315 1,638 / 7,757 1,815/10,615
CrossMark (overall/productivity/creativity/responsiveness) 1,699/1,643/1,754/1,710 1,492 / 1,420 / 1,661 / 1,251 1,454 / 1,353 / 1,650 / 1,235 1,720 / 1,576 / 1,917 / 1,619

You can see that with the CrossMark Productivity scoring, which hits 1,643 out of 2,500. Even PC Mark 10 gives it a good score of 5,482, And, when it comes to Intel P-class laptops, the scores are even closer across the board for the Acer Aspire. This just shows you how well-performing this laptop is without throttling and overheating in the plastic chassis that houses it.

That’s just performance, but battery life is great, too. I used the Acer Aspire for my web-based work, and it almost got me through my full day on a single charge. With the screen at about 40% brightness, and the Windows battery setting set to best power efficiency, I got to 6 hours of battery. Plugged into a 4K display on the same settings, it was halved around 3. I usually look for 5 hours as a baseline for the best battery on laptops, so this is great.

Should you buy the Acer Aspire Vero?

The Acer Aspire Vero is an environmentally friendly laptop, but you really should not buy it. I think there are better laptops for the price, like the Lenovo Yoga 7i, the Yoga 9i, or even a step up the ladder to a Huawei MateBook 16S.

Who should buy the Acer Aspire Vero

  • Those who care about the environment
  • Anyone who likes plastic laptops
  • Anyone who wants a well-performing laptop

Who should not buy the Acer Aspire Vero

  • Those who want a premium-feeling device

After two weeks with the Acer Aspire Vero, I did like the overall performance, but the one thing that bothered me was the plastic design. It’s still great for the environment though, so if I had purchased it, I would have been proud.

    Acer Aspire Vero
    The Acer Aspire Vero is an all-plastic eco friendly laptop that's well performing thanks to Intel's U-series CPUs

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

The post Acer Aspire Vero (14-inch) review: A unique eco-friendly laptop appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/WEvxwmq
via IFTTT

With Dynamic Island, Apple made use of the display cutout in ways Android brands just couldn’t yet

The only thing everyone can agree on when it comes to “Dynamic Island” is that it is a bad name. Otherwise, opinions on the actual usability or aesthetic of the new interactive pill-shaped cutout in the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max have been completely divisive. Personally, I was sold from the get-go, but I know colleagues who hate it, including my colleague Karthik who wrote this excellent editorial on why the Dynamic Island creates more problems than it solves.

I don’t disagree with his points actually. Switching from the notch to the pill-shaped cutout doesn’t give the new iPhones any meaningful extra screen space. The cutout actually sits further down the screen than the notch ever did. The clever UI elements Apple built as part of the Dynamic Island UI are indeed hard to reach with one hand — although that’s hardly the only UI element of iOS that’s not one-hand use friendly.

So, if I agree with my colleague’s points criticizing the Dynamic Island, why do I like it? Because I like that the island embraces a necessary hardware compromise of modern smartphones — the need for selfie cameras to eat into the screen — by building a fun and clever user interface on and around the cutout. Instead of ignoring the screen blemish, or even trying to hide it the way many Android brands have, Apple is embracing it, drawing attention to it, and making use of it.

Android brands see the hole as a flaw, and Apple sees it as an opportunity

I’ve been covering the Android scene for years, and the most exciting period in my opinion (at least until next year when the foldable wars really heat up on a global scale) was when Chinese Android brands bent over backward in 2018 trying to find ways to not need a notch. We got phones with pop-up camera modules, slider mechanisms, with entire full-sized screens on their backs — all so that a selfie camera can exist without eating into the screen.

The Nubia X, released in 2018, with a fully functional screen on its backside.

Those phones were absolutely fun to test for a gadget geek like me, but they were not practical, and those brands knew it. Because before long, they were all back to the notch, and eventually settled on the hole-punch cutout solution that’s ubiquitous in the Android scene.

But even now, Android brands seem sheepish about the existence of the selfie hole, because some brands like Xiaomi would dedicate marketing material and keynote time to brag about their phones having a “smaller hole than competitors.” Samsung and ZTE sacrificed selfie camera quality in favor of nascent under-screen camera technology.

Under-screen selfie camera of the Z Fold 3

Samsung chose to sacrifice the selfie camera in its Z Fold series in order to give us a slightly less noticeable hole.

Some Android skins, such as Oppo’s ColorOS or Motorola’s MyUI, give users the option to hide the cutout with a digital bezel.

Meanwhile, here’s Apple, not only embracing the hole-punch, but it designed software to make it bigger. Depending on the context, Apple would use black pixels to fill out space around the cutout to make it morph into different shapes and sizes.

The Dynamic Island showing music

For example, start a song on Spotify (or Apple Music) and swipe out of the app, and you’ll see the app fly into the island, which then expands to show the album cover art, along with an audio wave bar that thumps along to the tunes. Apple has even built a mini physics engine for this action, so depending on how you swipe, the app flies into the island at a different trajectory, and the island “catches” the app with the corresponding animations.

Like the Twitter user above, I am a sucker for animation flourishes, and little touches like this make the iPhone feel alive.

But it’s not just superficial flair, the Dynamic Island brings real functional use. Navigate with Apple Maps running in the background, for example, and you’ll see a constant arrow pointing you in the direction you should be going. Call a ride with Lyft, and you see the status of your ride. Start a timer, and you see the clock ticks down the seconds, all on the island.

And because Apple is Apple, there is a great chance all major apps will make use of the island eventually. Google Maps will surely adopt similar real-time navigation. If you fly a major airline, particularly a US-based one, you’ll probably see something like boarding time and gate information directly on the island. There are myriad different ways the island can be used, and I am confident it shall be used much more than it is being used right now.

Like it or not, the Dynamic Island is here to stay

Just like the original iPhone X notch, there will always be vocal Android diehards who will criticize it. But I am almost certain the Dynamic Island won’t alienate existing iPhone users, nor will it scare off the average consumer open to trying an iPhone. Remember, there was a similar outcry about the notch too when it debuted in 2017, and guess what, go to any major city in the US or Europe, and you’re seeing notches everywhere. In a year or two, you’ll be seeing Dynamic Islands everywhere. The question I’m more curious about is whether Android brands will follow suit and design similar UI interfaces.

    Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
    The A16-powered iPhone 14 Pro Max is the highest-end 2022 Apple phone. It supports the Dynamic Island and Always-On Display feature.
    Supcase Unicorn Beetle Style Case (Sponsored)
    This case offers three different color options to choose from, in addition to a minimalistic, slim build.

The post With Dynamic Island, Apple made use of the display cutout in ways Android brands just couldn’t yet appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/XQWU1Hb
via IFTTT

samedi 24 septembre 2022

Are the Apple AirPods Pro 2 waterproof? Do they have an IP rating?

Even though the new AirPods Pro 2 don’t feature any major design changes, Apple’s latest premium TWS earbuds bring several noteworthy improvements over the original AirPods Pro. The earbuds pack Apple’s latest H2 chip for improved connectivity, enhanced noise cancellation capabilities, a new inward-facing microphone for better audio quality in calls, and a longer-lasting battery. However, Apple hasn’t improved the durability of the newer model, and the AirPods Pro 2 still aren’t waterproof.

The AirPods Pro 2 are water resistant, not waterproof

While the Apple AirPods Pro 2 are not completely waterproof, they do come with an IPX4 water resistance rating. This means that the earbuds should be able to withstand damage from sweat and the occasional splash of water with relative ease. The IPX4 water resistance rating applies to both the earbuds and the charging case, so you shouldn’t worry if you plan on using the earbuds while working out.

For those not familiar with ‘Ingress Protection’ or IP ratings, the numbers following the IP signify how well a device can withstand dust and water. Since the AirPods Pro 2 have an IPX4 rating, the earbuds do not offer any protection from solid particles. A liquid ingress protection rating of 4 means that the AirPods Pro 2 can withstand splashes of water from all directions for up to 10 minutes.

The AirPods Pro 2 cannot, however, withstand being submerged in water, so you can’t take them for a swim. You should also be wary of wearing your AirPods Pro 2 to the beach as seawater is corrosive and can damage the earbuds.

As mentioned earlier, the IPX4 rating also applies to the new AirPods Pro 2 charging case, even though it features an open USB Type-C port and a speaker.

    Apple AirPods Pro 2
    The AirPods Pro 2 come with an IPX4 water resistance rating. While the earbuds are not completely waterproof, they can withstand sweat and splashes of water.

The AirPods Pro 2 are available for purchase on the Apple Store, Best Buy, and Amazon. If you’re planning to pick one up, check out our roundup of the best AirPods Pro 2 deals to save some cash.

The post Are the Apple AirPods Pro 2 waterproof? Do they have an IP rating? appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/j4623cb
via IFTTT

How many software updates will the Apple iPhone 14 series get?

Apple revealed the iPhone 14 line during its Far Out event. This time around, the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus barely got any attention. Meanwhile, the Pro models introduce plenty of notable upgrades and changes. These include an Always-On Display, the Dynamic Island, and a 48MP Wide camera lens. Though, one thing about iPhones is that no matter what model you have, they all feel the same — in a way. As long as you’re running the same iOS version, the experience on two different iPhone generations will be similar. Of course, there are exclusives here and there, but the overall UX and UI remain unchanged. That’s a good thing for the consumer, by the way. Software updates rejuvenate older iPhones and make you less tempted to upgrade your hardware. If you plan to buy an iPhone 14, you must be wondering — how many years of software updates will it get?

Software updates on the iPhone 14 series: You get a lot of them

Apple doesn’t state the exact number of software updates a certain device will receive. However, the company has a long history that we can use as a reference to make an estimation. The Cupertino firm is famous for the long years of support it provides its customers. In fact, you will likely upgrade to a newer iPhone model before your iPhone 14 loses software support. To make an assumption, let’s look into two recently-dropped devices — the iPhones 6S and 7.

These two phones launched in 2015 and 2016, and they initially ran iOS 9 and iOS 10 — respectively. Both support iOS 15 as the last major version bump. So, in terms of feature updates, they remained supported for a total of seven and six years, respectively. Meanwhile, devices on iOS 12 are still receiving security patches to this day. So you can expect the iPhone 6S and 7 to receive a few more iOS 15.x releases down the road. Now, let’s see what this means for software updates on the iPhone 14.

The iPhone 14 launched in 2022 and runs iOS 16 out of the box. So if it receives six years of updates, that would mean you’ll be good to go until 2028 — or iOS 22. There’s a chance you will be receiving more than six major updates, and, usually, the safe bet is at least five years. After the company drops support, you will still likely be receiving minor patches for years to come. With the iPhone 14 virtually having a long life — thanks to software updates, you may want to buy a case to make sure its hardware stays intact, too.

    Apple iPhone 14
    The iPhone 14 is in many ways a tweaked iPhone 13. It is powered by Apple's A15 Bionic chip and runs iOS 16.
    SUPCASE Unicorn Beetle Style Case (Sponsored)
    This case offers three different color options to choose from, in addition to a minimalistic, slim build.

Which iPhone 14 model are you buying, and why? Let us know in the comments section below.

The post How many software updates will the Apple iPhone 14 series get? appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/XafGH60
via IFTTT

The one Steam Deck feature that Valve still needs to get right

It’s been a pretty wild year for the Steam Deck. From the moment it first went on pre-order it was obvious it would be a success. Even now, despite recent accelerations in production, Valve still hasn’t fulfilled all the pre-orders for its handheld PC.

Despite being on the large side, the hardware is fantastic. I’ve been truly amazed by how much performance you can get from what is basically a handheld games console. Playing Marvel’s Spider-Man on the go at similar graphics and performance to its initial PS4 launch, but, well, anywhere, never gets old.

A big part of the experience is the software, though. Valve has managed to turn SteamOS into something easy to use on this type of device. Those who care know that it’s Linux underneath, but those who don’t need never know. And SteamOS has come a long way even in the short life of the Steam Deck to date. But there’s still one key feature it just doesn’t hit the mark on; offline mode. Something that’s pretty essential for a portable games console.

Offline mode still isn’t good enough

Halo MCC on Steam Deck

Simply put, offline mode is necessary because without a data connection your Steam Deck can’t ping the servers as and when it needs to. Obviously multiplayer is out, but it has implications for simply being able to play games. Traditionally Steam hasn’t needed to worry as much about not having a data connection since, well, PC gamers quite often have one.

Recently Valve has tried to address the issue with updates to SteamOS but it just hasn’t nailed it. At least not yet. My own experience so far has largely entailed connecting my Steam Deck to a hotspot from my phone just to get around offline mode being a pain. But I’ve not tried it in a while. But a segment on a recent Linux Game Cast episode mentioned that it’s still not good and, low and behold, that seems to be the case.

The issue isn’t that it doesn’t work, because it does, it just doesn’t work very well. In my own experience, even just enabling offline mode can be a chore, resulting in a mixed understanding of if it’s even on. Unless you remember to turn the offline mode on manually while you’re still connected to data, it can just, forget. And as such, it’ll try and connect to the servers, even though there’s no data connection, and launching a game will take an age. It usually works in the end, but I’ve lost count of the times I’ve given up and put the Steam Deck down because I just can’t be bothered with this.

An under-appreciated but important feature

Steam Deck unboxing

The whole purpose of a handheld games console is that you can take it anywhere. Issues such as battery life can be addressed with outside help, but issues such as offline mode’s distinct jankyness cannot. And it’s putting a real dampener on the experience, frankly. Maybe we’ve been spoiled by the fact the Nintendo Switch doesn’t suffer such issues.

But the Switch is also the gold standard. Unless a game actually needs a data connection, it’s just not an issue. As it shouldn’t be. Workarounds aren’t the user experience we need, and I guarantee that on my next trip I’ll forget to turn on offline mode and I’ll probably end up hot spotting my phone again just to make everything work swiftly.

The Steam Deck is so good already and Valve should be commended for the speed at which work has continued on SteamOS throughout 2022. And clearly, the company knows that the offline mode isn’t good enough. But the most recent fixes don’t seem to have done enough. I really hope that as the last batches of pre-orders start to arrive, this feature finally gets what it needs.

    Steam Deck
    Valve's first portable gaming PC, the Steam Deck is one of the hottest devices of 2022 with a huge library of games to play on it

The post The one Steam Deck feature that Valve still needs to get right appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/4M5vpCN
via IFTTT