LightBlog

lundi 16 août 2021

PureVPN is the Industry Benchmark According to KPMG’s Always-On Audit

VPN services will spend a lot of time pitching their services like geo-restriction bypass, server speeds, ad-block, and software features. These are all fantastic things to have, but privacy remains one of the main reasons people use a VPN. Users want to know that their internet traffic is private and not being logged. While most VPN companies will swear that they never save logs, PureVPN can actually guarantee it, thanks to a recent audit.

The past three audits of PureVPN have confirmed their no-logs policy. The first audit was conducted by Altius IT, with the second two done by KPMG. Now PureVPN is beginning a first-of-its-kind always-on audit. This means that they can be surprise-audited at any time, allowing the leading audit firm KPMG to check for any stored users logs.

Your privacy is as dear and respected to us as ours. Understandably, it becomes a more personal matter to ensure that your privacy is well-guarded in all manners and across the board.

To uphold your continuous trust and demonstrate our utter commitment to ensuring your privacy, we recently requested our second no-log audit, with the first being the Altius IT audit.

This time we asked one of the Big Four auditing firms, KPMG, to independently scrutinize our systems and assess our zero-log claims.

Expectedly, KPMG testifies that PureVPN is true to its no-log claims, and it has never, nor will it ever, monitor or store your private data under any circumstances.

PureVPN

To conduct a complete audit of PureVPN’s systems, KPMG performed an in-depth inspection of the complete infrastructure. After the lengthy process was finished, their audit produced the following findings:

  • PureVPN doesn’t log a user’s origin IP address
  • PureVPN doesn’t log a user’s assigned VPN IP
  • PureVPN doesn’t log the specific time when a user connects to a VPN server
  • PureVPN doesn’t log a user’s activities through its VPN connection

With this new type of audit, users are able to have more trust in their VPN service. Hopefully this trend will be implemented in other VPN companies as well, so people can have more confidence in no-log policy claims.

If you’re someone who takes their privacy seriously, and wants to be sure that your VPN service is not logging your data, PureVPN might be the best choice for you.

We thank PureVPN for sponsoring this post. Our sponsors help us pay for the many costs associated with running XDA, including server costs, full time developers, news writers, and much more. While you might see sponsored content (which will always be labeled as such) alongside Portal content, the Portal team is in no way responsible for these posts. Sponsored content, advertising and XDA Depot are managed by a separate team entirely. XDA will never compromise its journalistic integrity by accepting money to write favorably about a company, or alter our opinions or views in any way. Our opinion cannot be bought.

The post PureVPN is the Industry Benchmark According to KPMG’s Always-On Audit appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3xPWGLK
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: Choosing an ecosystem

Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 3 is now official, which means it’s time to compare it to the top device from the Korean firm’s top competitor, Apple. Apple doesn’t make foldables, so our comparison remains limited to their best device right now, the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Why even make the comparison in the first place? It makes sense for average users who are out in the market to spend around $1000 and are informed of their options through marketing and advertising. To them, these options make sense, and consequently, the comparison makes sense.

Obviously, it’s like these two smartphones come from two different worlds. One is foldable; one isn’t. One runs Android; one runs iOS. They live in two completely different ecosystems. In fact, when making that purchasing decision, you should probably consider what ecosystem you want to live in. Both Samsung and Apple offer a full stack including smartphones, tablets, laptops, smartwatches, Bluetooth earbuds, and more.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs iPhone 12 Pro Max Specs

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Processor 5nm 64-bit Octa-Core Processor (2.84GHz + 2.4GHz + 1.8GHz) A14 Bionic (3.1GHz dual-core, 1.8GHz quad-core)
Display Main screen: 6.7-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Display (22:9)
Infinity Flex Display 2,640×1,080, 425ppi, 120Hz adaptive refresh rate
Cover screen: 1.9-inch Super AMOLED Display 260×512, 302ppi
6.7 inches, 1,284×2,778, Super Retina XDR OLED, 19,5:9, 458ppi
Body Folded: 72.2×86.4×17.1mm
Unfolded: 72.2x166x6.9mm
Weight: 183g
160.8×78.1×7.4mm (228g)
Cameras 12MP f/1.8 wide (OIS, Dual Pixel AF) + 12MP f/2.2 ultra-wide
Front: 10MP f/2.4
12MP wide f/1.6 (Dual Pixel PDAF, sensor-shift stabilization) + 12MP ultra-wide f/2.4 + 12MP 2.5x telephoto f/2.2 (PDAF, OIS)
Front: 12MP f/2.2
Battery 3,300mAh dual battery 3,687mAh
Memory 8GB RAM, 128GB/256GB UFS 3.1 storage 6GB RAM with 128GB/256GB/512GB storage
Water resistance IPX8 IP68
OS Android 11 iOS 14
Colors Cream, Green, Lavender, Phantom Black, Gray, White, Pink Silver, Graphite, Gold, Pacific Blue
Price Starts at $1,799 Starts at $1,099

Design and Display: The Galaxy Z Flip 3 folds, the iPhone doesn’t

Indeed, the key difference between these two devices is that one folds, and the other doesn’t. The whole idea behind the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip series is that it can be folded into something more compact and pocketable, while the iPhone 12 Pro Max is a standard rectangular slab that makes no such attempts. In fact, for a lot of people, the iPhone 12 Pro Max is a little too big, and my colleague Ben can often be heard complaining about the poor ergonomics on the Pro Max.

iPhone 12 Pro Max on top of Galaxy Z Flip 3

There are other advantages too. Both displays are OLED, of course. Samsung offers a 120Hz refresh rate though, which means you get smoother motion and animations.

On the other hand, the display on the iPhone 12 Pro Max is both larger and with a higher resolution. Both screens are 6.7 inches measured diagonally, but with the larger 19.5:9 aspect ratio, the screen on the iPhone is bigger than the 22:9 display on the Galaxy Z Flip 3. The pixel density is still higher with the iPhone at 458ppi, compared to 425ppi.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and iPhone 12 Pro Max with displays on

Since the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a foldable device, it does have an additional screen on the outside, which is good for seeing the time and notifications. It’s worth noting because while Apple does have a much larger screen that’s in plain sight all the time, it’s not always on.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 in all four colors with screens on

The Galaxy Z Flip 3 also comes in more fun colors than the iPhone 12 Pro Max does. Apple just doesn’t do fun colors with its ‘Pro’ products, so there’s only Graphite, Silver, Gold, and Pacific Blue. If you want fun colors, you have to sacrifice some quality.

Note the iPhone 12 Pro Max has a larger battery, and consequently better battery life. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is 45g lighter than the iPhone 12 Pro Max, so that compromise might be worth it for those looking at the portability aspect of the device.

Camera: The iPhone 12 Pro Max beats the Galaxy Z Flip 3

The camera isn’t the priority with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Indeed, this device is all about the form factor. If you want a regular smartphone that you can fold into something smaller, that’s exactly what the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is for. That doesn’t mean that it has a bad camera, but it’s more likely to be beaten by a more traditional smartphone.

Both of these devices have 12MP main sensors, although there’s a smaller f/1.8 aperture on the Galaxy Z Flip 3 than the f/1.6 aperture on the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Both of them offer a night mode, but I’d expect better low-light performance out of the iPhone.

iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Z Flip 3 cameras

They also both have ultra-wide sensors, f/2.4 on the iPhone and f/2.2 on the Galaxy. The iPhone 12 Pro Max is the only one with a third, telephoto lens, and that comes in with 2.5x zoom. If you’re into lossless zoom, that’s a clear advantage for the iPhone.

Honestly, if you’re looking for the best camera chops from Samsung, you came to the wrong place. The Galaxy S21 Ultra is the clear winner there, and even the Galaxy Z Fold 3 does a better job than the Galaxy Z Flip 3. The smaller something gets, the harder it is to pack technology into it. That doesn’t mean that the cameras are poor on the Galaxy Z Flip 3 — they’re pretty good for what they are, and most users should be content with the general package. But if you’re specifically looking to flex your camera skills, the iPhone 12 Pro Max is the but-obvious winner.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor, while the iPhone 12 Pro Max uses Apple’s custom A14 Bionic chipset. That means they also have two completely different ISPs. Indeed, it’s not just the sensor that decides how good a smartphone camera is. The image signal processor and the software also both make a big difference.

Many of the improvements in the Qualcomm Spectra 580 have to do with triple-lens cameras, such as the ability to take three pictures at the same time. Obviously, that doesn’t help the Galaxy Z Flip 3. Apple of course develops its own ISP to work directly with the sensor since it owns the whole stack. That’s how it can come up with cool features like Deep Fusion, which is meant to improve texture and detail.

Conclusion: Buying into an ecosystem

If you’re just buying a phone and that’s it, that’s fine. You might even be the type that just never buys first-party accessories in the lifetime of the device. There are lots of Bluetooth earbuds that work with any device, and the same goes for smartwatches. In fact, almost all of Samsung’s peripherals work with iPhones too, although a lot of Apple’s stuff doesn’t work with non-Apple devices.

Let’s take a look at what you’re buying into.

Samsung Apple
Phone Galaxy Z Flip 3 iPhone 12 Pro Max
Smartwatch Galaxy Watch 4 Apple Watch Series 6
Earbuds Galaxy Buds 2 AirPods
Tablet Galaxy Tab S7 iPad Pro
Laptop Galaxy Book Pro MacBook Pro

If you’re at a point right now where you’re looking at phones, you might not have even thought about this yet. It’s something to consider, so perhaps it’s worth doing some light research on options like a smartwatch and earbuds just to see what you like. No one is forcing you to pair up with a smartwatch right away, but it’s just something to think about.

iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Z Flip 3 cameras

There’s no easy decision as to whether to go with Samsung or Apple, or to go with Android or iOS. A lot of that comes down to personal preference. As far as the hardware goes, the iPhone 12 Pro Max is objectively better, and why shouldn’t it be? The traditional form factor is always better because we already know how to make it good. It has a better camera, a larger battery, a better screen, and more.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 folds into something more compact. It’s lighter and fits into smaller spaces, while the iPhone 12 Pro Max is actually quite big. If you’re used to fitting your phone into small spaces, then a big device like the iPhone 12 Pro Max is going to stick out. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 could be just the fix for that problem that you need.

If you go for the Flip 3, make sure to check out our deals roundup. There are also lots of cases to check out.

    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3
    The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 takes the flip phone form factor and takes it to the next level.
    iPhone 12 Pro Max
    The iPhone 12 Pro Max is the flagship of Apple's smartphone family.

The post Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: Choosing an ecosystem appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/37NcF2I
via IFTTT

dimanche 15 août 2021

Microsoft Pro Intellimouse drops to its lowest price yet of $36

Microsoft’s IntelliMouse line was a popular series of computer mice throughout the late 1990s and early 2000s, and the lineup was brought back to life in 2017 with a similar design and updated internals. Microsoft later released the Pro IntelliMouse with an even better sensor, and now that model is on sale for $35.99 at multiple retailers — the lowest price we’ve seen yet, and a sizeable discount from the original $60 MSRP.

The Microsoft Pro Intellimouse is available in two colors, Dark Shadow and Light Shadow. It closely resembles the design of the old IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0, with a longer frame ideal for people with large hands. The sensor is the PixArt PAW3389PRO-MS, and the DPI is customizable from 100 to 16,00. Even though it’s a Microsoft-made mouse, it works without a problem on Mac, Linux, Android, and any other platform that supports standard USB mice.

    Microsoft Pro Intellimouse
    This upgraded version of the classic IntelliMouse is $35.99 at multiple retailers, $24 below the usual price.

The main drawback is that this mouse is wired, so if you were hoping for a wireless productivity mouse, you’ll have to look elsewhere. Also, this mouse isn’t ideal for left-handed people, but that goes for most computer mice.

The post Microsoft Pro Intellimouse drops to its lowest price yet of $36 appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3iKeweW
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Galaxy Watch Active 2: It’s time for One UI Watch

Samsung has announced the Galaxy Watch 4, and with it, Samsung is folding the “Active” moniker back into the main lineup. Compared to the Galaxy Watch Active 2, its spiritual predecessor, there are some big improvements. These come from both the software and hardware sides of things, and it’s kind of a big deal, not just for Samsung but for the broader Android ecosystem as well.

It’s got more RAM, more storage, a better processor, and a lower starting price. But not only that, there’s an entirely new operating system being used. Samsung is finally ditching Tizen in its smartwatches.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 Specs

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2: Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2
Display
  • 44mm: 1.36″ (450×450), 330ppi
  • 40mm: 1.19″ (396×396), 330ppi
  • 46mm: 1.36″ (450×450), 330ppi
  • 42mm: 1.19″ (396×396), 330ppi
  • 44mm: 1.4″ (360×360)
  • 40mm: 1.2″ (360×360)
Processor Exynos W920 (5nm) Exynos 9110 Dual core 1.15GHz
Memory
  • 1.5GB RAM + 16GB internal storage
  • LTE: 1.5GB RAM + 4GB Internal Memory
  • Bluetooth: 768MB RAM + 4GB Internal Memory
Dimension and Weight
  • Aluminum case
  • 44mm: 44.4 x 43.3 x 9.8mm, 30.3g
  • 40mm: 40.4 x 39.3 x 9.8mm, 25.9g
  • Stainless steel case
  • 46mm: 45.5 x 45.5 x 11mm, 52g
  • 42mm: 41.5 x 41.5 x 11.2mm, 46.5g
  • 44mm: 44 x 44 x 10.9mm (42g for stainless steel, 30g for aluminum)
  • 40mm: 40 x 40 x 10.9mm (37g for stainless steel, 26g for aluminum)
Battery
  • 44mm: 361mAh
  • 40mm: 247mAh
  • 46mm: 361mAh
  • 42mm: 247mAh
  • 44mm: 340mAh
  • 40mm: 247mAh
Sensor Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Light Sensor, Samsung BioActive Sensor (Optical Heart Rate Sensor + Electrical heart sensor + Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Sensor) Accelerometer, Gyro, Barometer, HRM, Ambient Light
Price Starts at $249.99 Starts at $349.99 Starts at $269.99

Hardware: The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 beats the Galaxy Watch Active 2 in every way

The new Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch 4 Classic have Samsung’s own Exynos W920 processor. It’s the first 5nm processor to go in a Galaxy watch. It definitely beats out the dual-core Exynos 9110 that was found in the Galaxy Watch Active 2. There’s no surprise there though. A newer processor is undoubtedly going to be a faster processor.

Angled view of Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch Active 2

RAM is the same 1.5GB, but storage has been bumped up from 4GB on the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 to 16GB on the Galaxy Watch 4. That battery is bigger too at 361mAh for the 44mm model, although the smaller model’s battery size is the same. The smaller one is actually 0.1g lighter though, while the bigger one is 0.3g heavier, something literally no one will care about because you won’t be able to tell the difference of 0.3g or 0.1g.

Indeed, everything is a bit better on the Galaxy Watch 4 than it is on the Galaxy Watch Active 2. It has a better processor, four times as much storage, and a bigger battery. While that covers the standard “feels faster”, let’s talk about things you can actually see and feel.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch Active 2 side by side on wooden surface

The screen has a higher resolution on the Galaxy Watch 4. It’s 450 x 450 on a 1.36-inch screen with the larger model (44mm or 46mm case depending on the one you choose) and a 396 x 396 1.19-inch display on the smaller one (40mm or 42mm). That gives it a 330ppi pixel density on either one, which is much higher than on the Galaxy Watch Active 2, which has a 360 x 360 screen on either a 1.4 or 1.2-inch size. In other words, things look sharper and prettier on the Galaxy Watch 4.

Bottom of Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch Active 2

The Galaxy Watch 4 also has a new Samsung BioActive Sensor, which is a three-in-one sensor that detects heart rate (PPG), ECG, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The Korean firm says the new sensor is groundbreaking, and indeed, it’s impressive.

Software: Tizen is gone now

Back at Google I/O, the company announced that it was rebuilding Wear OS, a much-needed improvement to a smartwatch OS that hasn’t had any meaningful changes in a very long time. One thing it promised was a unified platform that combines Google Wear OS and Tizen, the OS that’s been used on Samsung smartwatches.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch Active 2 app drawers

We’re getting a taste of that new unified platform with the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4. It uses what Samsung is calling One UI Watch, and it’s meant to provide the best of both worlds. Those worlds, of course, are Google services and Samsung services.

Those Google services include apps from the Google Play Store. Indeed, with the Galaxy Watch 4, you get access to the ecosystem of Wear OS apps, rather than just the Tizen apps available for the Galaxy Watch Active 2. You also get Google Maps, and whatever else you’re missing. But it still works well with your Samsung phone, syncing your settings and such. It’s really meant to be the best of both worlds. But as a side note, the Galaxy Watch 4 does not work with devices that do not have GMS (Google Mobile Services), which means you can’t even pair it with an Apple iPhone or a Huawei device. The Galaxy Watch Active 2 remains compatible with Android and iOS, so there’s wider compatibility.

Conclusion: Should you buy the Galaxy Watch 4 or the Galaxy Watch Active 2?

The question of which one you should buy is always a tricky one, but that’s especially true of smartwatches. The answer is the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, due to the much better hardware, and the software that has been tremendously improved. However, many smartwatch users go for deals. If this is your first smartwatch, you might not see the benefit of spending extra on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4.

Angled view of Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy Watch Active 2

Here’s the deal though. Newer products are better than older ones, except in those rare cases where companies make dumb mistakes, such as no compatibility on non-GMS devices. With the newer product, you’ll also get better support. Indeed, don’t expect any new features to arrive on the Galaxy Watch Active 2, considering One UI Watch is the new thing moving forward.

    Samsung Galaxy Watch 4
    The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 has a new BioActive sensor, and a new unified software platform called One UI Watch.

Ultimately, Samsung has some of the best watches that can be paired with most Android phones. The newer Watch 4 does not work with iOS, so if that’s what you’re looking for, you’ll want to see how it compares to an Apple Watch. The Galaxy Watch 4, and especially the One UI Watch software, just takes the Android experience to another level.

    Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2
    The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 still runs Tizen, but it comes in 4G models, or with your choice of aluminum or stainless steel.

If you decide to grab one, make sure to check out the different bands that are available.

The post Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Galaxy Watch Active 2: It’s time for One UI Watch appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3iKbVBM
via IFTTT

samedi 14 août 2021

Dell XPS 17 vs LG gram 17: What’s the best 17 inch laptop?

If you’re looking to buy a premium 17 inch laptop, there are two options you’re likely to come across. The Dell XPS 17 and the LG gram 17 are both fantastic laptops at this size, but they’re also radically different machines. The Dell XPS 17 is a very powerful laptop and one of Dell’s best. The LG gram 17 is one of the best lightweight laptops you can buy, but that low weight comes with trade-offs.

In this guide, we’re going to go through the differences so you can make a more informed decision. But overall, the decision should be fairly straightforward between the two. It’s all dependent on your use case.

Specs

Let’s start by taking a look at the specs for each laptop. You’ll notice some major differences right off the bat, not only in terms of power, but the available options. The LG gram 17 is much more streamlined, and there aren’t many different configurations available.

Dell XPS 17 LG gram 17
Processor
  • Intel Core i5-11400H (up to 4.5GHz, 6-core)
  • Intel Core i7-11800H (up to 4.8GHz, 8-core)
  • Intel Core i9-11900H (up to 4.9GHz, 8-core)
  • Intel Core i9-11980HK (up to 5GHz, 8-core)
  • Intel Core i7-1165G7 (up to 4.7GHz, 4-core)
Graphics
  • Intel UHD Graphics
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB GDDR6 (60W)
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 6GB GDDR6 (70W)
  • Intel Iris Xe Graphics
RAM
  • 8GB
  • 16GB
  • 32GB
  • 64GB
  • 16GB
Storage
  • 512GB
  • 1TB
  • 2TB
  • 4TB
  • 1TB
  • 2TB
Display
  • 17-inch, Full HD+ (1920 x 1200), InfinityEdge, anti-glare, non-touch, 500 nits
  • 17-inch, Ultra HD+ (3840 x 2400), InfinityEdge, anti-glare, touchscreen, 100% Adobe RGB, 94% DCI-P3, 500 nits
  • 17-inch WQXGA (2560 x 1600) IPS, non-touch, 99% DCI-P3
Audio
  • Quad stereo speakers (two 2W woofers, two 2.5W tweeters)
  • Dual stereo speakers (1.5W x 2)
Webcam
  • 2.25mm, 720p HD 30fps camera with IR
  • 720p HD camera
Biometric authentication
  • Windows Hello IR camera + fingerprint reader
  • Windows Hello fingerprint reader
Battery
  • 6-cell 97Whr battery
  • 2-Cell 80Whr battery
Ports
  • 4 Thunderbolt 4 (USB Type-C) ports
  • SD card reader
  • 3,5mm headphone jack
  • USB Type-C to Type-A, USB Type-C to HDMI 2.0 adapters included
  • 2 Thunderbolt 4 (USB Type-C) ports
  • 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports
  • HDMI 2.0
  • microSD card reader
  • 3.5mm headphone jack
Connectivity
  • Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650 (2×2), Bluetooth 5.1
  • Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 + Bluetooth 5.1
Colors
  • Platinum Silver exterior + black interior
  • Black
  • Silver
Size (WxDxH) 14.74 x 9.76 x 0.77 in (374.45 x 248.05 x 19.05 mm) 14.97 x 10.24 x 0.7 in (380.24 x 260.1 x 17.78 mm)
Weight 4.87 lbs (2.21 kg) (non-touch), 5.34 lbs (2.42 kg) (touch) 2.98 lbs (1.35 kg)
Starting price $1,599.99 $1,799

Design: The LG gram 17 is crazy light

Like we said at the start, while these are both 17 inch laptops, they’re wholly different beasts in just about every other way. The LG gram brand is built almost exclusively on how light it is, and that stays true here. At 2.98lbs, this is easily one of the lightest 17 inch laptops you can buy. If you’re a student buying a laptop for school work, this gives you the benefits of a large screen in a package you can truly take with you anywhere.

LG Gram 17

By comparison, the Dell XPS 17 is a hefty machine, starting at 4.87lbs for the version without a touchscreen. If you add touch, that goes up to 5.34lbs; it’s definitely not insignificant. Interestingly though, the Dell XPS 17 is more compact, which is thanks to Dell’s efforts to minimize bezels as much as possible. This notoriously comes at the cost of the webcam quality, and if you’re worried about portability, the weight difference is far more significant here.

On the topic of ports, both of these laptops support Thunderbolt 4, but the LG gram 17 packs a few more old-school ports to accommodate all kinds of users. You get two Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB 3.2 Type-A ports, and HDMI 2.0. By comparison, the Dell XPS 17 has four Thunderbolt 4 ports, with Type-C to Type-A adapter and a Type-C to HDMI adapter included. Both laptops have a 3,5mm headphone jack, and the LG gram 17 has a microSD card reader, while the Dell XPS 17 has a full-size SD card reader. The LG gram offers a wider array of connectivity that “just works” for most people out of the box. Plugging in peripherals is a little less convenient with the XPS 17.

The LG gram offers a wider array of connectivity that “just works” for most people out of the box.

Where the Dell XPS 17 has an advantage is the presence of an IR camera for Windows Hello, which makes unlocking your computer a breeze. Both laptops also have fingerprint readers, and the LG gram 17 has the fingerprint reader in the power button. This is also nice because the computer can read your fingerprint and unlock automatically when it gets to the login screen. Still, facial recognition is just a little bit better.

Dell XPS 17 9510 angled view

In terms of overall design, these are both traditional clamshell laptops, and while neither of them does anything crazy, the Dell XPS 17 may be a bit more unique-looking. It uses carbon fiber for the keyboard base, which gives it a dual-tone look with the silver exterior. The LG gram comes in either black or silver, fairly standard colors that don’t have any special flair to them.

Performance: The Dell XPS 17 is a powerhouse

Conversely to the previous category, the Dell XPS 17 is an absolute monster in terms of performance when compared to the LG gram 17. It’s not a heavy laptop for no reason, and it starts by packing 45W processors, compared to the 15W chips inside the gram 17. More power draw means more cooling is required, so naturally, more components need to be inside the laptop. And naturally, that means more performance.

There’s no denying that the Dell XPS 17 is much more powerful than the gram 17.

Comparing the average GeekBench scores for these processors, you can see even the Core i5 model in the Dell XPS 17 is significantly faster than the processor in the LG gram. This is especially evident in the multi-core results.

Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Core i5-11400H Intel Core i7-11800H
Average GeekBench score (single-core/multi-core) 1396/4567 1403/6028 1502/8152

That’s only half the story, too, because you can also add NVIDIA GeForce graphics up to a 70W RTX 3060 on the Dell XPS 17. That’s a far cry from the integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics on the LG gram, though to be fair, upgrading to these more powerful models also makes the Dell XPS 17 far more expensive. Similarly, you can configure the Dell XPS 17 with up to 64GB of RAM and 4TB of SSD storage, which easily makes this the most powerful of the two laptops. The LG gram 17 comes with 16GB of RAM and either 1TB or 2TB of storage, and that’s about it.

Dell XPS 17

There’s no denying the Dell XPS 17 is much more powerful than the gram 17. However, it needs to be said the power on the XPS 17 can also be overkill for many. This is a powerhouse of a PC, yes, but it’s meant for creative professionals and other high-end tasks. You can also use it as a gaming machine if you opt for the RTX graphics, and it can do that very well. But if you’re using your laptop for school work, browsing the web, and other day-to-day tasks, the LG gram 17 is still a very high-end and very fast PC.

Display and sound: You can get a better experience on the Dell XPS 17

Moving on to the display experience on these laptops, it’s an interesting situation. The Dell XPS 17 comes with the option for a 4K Ultra HD+ (3840 x 2400) display, which is obviously incredibly sharp. However, that upgrade is an expensive one, adding $400 to the base price. The base model comes with a Full HD+ display (1920 x 1200). Meanwhile, the LG gram 17 sits somewhere in the middle, with a Quad HD+ (2560 x 1600) panel as the only option. This is arguably the sweet spot in terms of resolution on a display this size. 4K is obviously sharper, but you’ll have to weigh that against the increased price and the impact on battery life.

LG gram 17 display

There’s more to it, though. The Dell XPS 17’s 4K display covers 100% of Adobe RGB and 94% of DCI-P3, which makes it ideal for creative professionals. The LG gram 17 simply touts 99% DCI-P3 coverage, but it may not be as ideal in the Adobe RGB color space. As a bonus for the Dell XPS 17, the 4K variant comes with a touchscreen, which can often be a more intuitive way to use your PC. There’s no option for touch on the LG gram.

The display experience is also likely to be far better on the Dell XPS 17. It uses a quad-speaker system with two woofers and two tweeters for stereo sound. On top of that, those speakers are right next to the keyboard, facing up, so you’re getting audio blasted directly at you. On the LG gram, you get a pair of stereo speakers on the underside of the laptop, and it’s just not as loud or immersive.

The bottom line: power or portability?

Ultimately, deciding between these two laptops should be fairly easy based on what you’re looking for. Do you want something you can use for school or work that involves writing, reading, and maybe even some image and (light) video editing? The LG gram 17 is still a very powerful laptop for those tasks, and it’s incredibly light. It’s significantly more portable and it doesn’t sacrifice battery life to be as light as it is. It’s the obvious choice for more mainstream users.

No matter which one you choose, you’re getting a great computer that can last you for years, so you can’t really go wrong with either one.

On the other hand, if you want the absolute most power in a package that’s very compact — albeit a bit heavy — then the Dell XPS 17 is for you. There’s probably almost nothing you might want to do on this laptop that you won’t be able to do, depending on your configuration. Professional video and image editing, 3D creation, and gaming should all be a breeze on the XPS 17. It’s not something you’ll want to take everywhere you go, but if you need a workhorse you can take on the road, then this is it.

Unlike some other decisions, it’s incredibly clear what compromises each of these laptops make over the other. You choose the LG gram 17 for your portable work or school computer that you take everywhere, or you choose the Dell XPS 17 to be your workstation that’s still (relatively) portable. No matter which one you choose, you’re getting a great computer that can last you for years, so you can’t really go wrong with either one. If you’ve made your decision, you can buy your new laptop using the links below.

    Dell XPS 17
    The Dell XPS 17 is a powerful laptop, featuring high-end specs such 11th-generation 45W Intel processors, 64GB of RAM, and 4TB of storage. Plus, you can get it with up to a 70W GeForce RTX 3060 from Nvidia. You can also get it with up to a 4K touchscreen display.
    LG gram 17
    The LG gram 17 is an impressive 17 inch laptop that offers top-notch specs in a very lightweight design. At less than 3lbs, it's super portable, but still powerful for all kinds of day-to-day tasks.

The post Dell XPS 17 vs LG gram 17: What’s the best 17 inch laptop? appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3xOHgHw
via IFTTT

These are the Best 16 inch Apple MacBook Pro cases: UAG, Supcase, Spigen, and more

Apple’s 16 inch MacBook Pro is currently the only notebook that the company sells with an Intel chipset. The 16 inch model was a replacement for the 15 inch MacBook Pro when it was launched in 2019 with a similar size, but a larger 16 inch 3072 x 1920 Retina display with narrow bezels. It was also the largest MacBook screen since the 17 inch MacBook Pro, which was discontinued in 2012. It’s expected Apple will be updating the notebook later this year, and like the current-gen 13 inch MacBook Pro and MacBook Air, it’ll be powered by an ARM-based M1 chipset, possibly with a higher core count and clock speeds.

It’s also expected the new 16 inch MacBook Pro will come with a design refresh, possibly new color options similar to the recently announced 24 inch iMac. The latest rumors suggest Apple is working on bringing back the various ports that were removed from the previous design in 2016 where, apart from Thunderbolt, we could see the return of the Magsafe charging port, an SD card reader, and even an HDMI port. The new MacBook Pro could also see the introduction of a mini-LED display similar to the 2021 12.9 inch iPad Pro.

However, if you’re planning to hold on to one of the last Intel-based Macs, check out some of the best cases for the 16 inch MacBook Pro.

    Spigen Rugged Armor

    Best rugged protection

    The Spigen Rugged Armor case features a strong design featuring a bumper to protect the edges and corners that helps to prevent scuffs and bumps and a unique transparent finish for the lid and bottom.
    UAG Plyo Case

    Lightweight case with military protection

    UAG is known for making some of the best tough cases for all sorts of devices. The Plyo series offers a lightweight, transparent design that offers all-round protection and meets military drop-test standards (MIL STD 810G 516.6).
    Supcase Unicorn Beetle

    Best value case

    Like the UAG and Spigen cases, the Unicorn Beetle offers excellent rugged protection with drop protection thanks to the strong bumpers around the edges. However, this comes at a relatively cheaper price, thus offering great value.

    Promoted

    Tomtoc Laptop Sleeve

    Best carrying sleeve

    Apart from offering protection to your laptop, the Tomtoc laptop sleeve offers a retractable handle for easy carrying, and comes with an additional zipper compartment to stow in accessories like chargers, cables, UBS drives, etc.
    Incase Textured Hardshell Case

    Hardshell case with fabric finish

    A snap on hardshell case for the 16 inch MacBook Pro having a unique fabric finish made out of Woolenex material overlayed on Bayer Makrolonâ injection-molded shell.
    Mosiso Hard Shell Case

    Affordable shell case

    An affordable, lightweight shell case that can easily snap onto your MacBook Pro. It's available in a variety of colors if you wish to add some color to your notebook.
    ProCase Hard Shell case

    Hard shell case with foldable feet

    Another hard shell case that offers a dual-layer finish for extra protection along with foldable feet at the bottom to raise the keyboard for a better angle for typing and improved airflow.
    Comfyable Slim Laptop Sleeve

    Faux leather sleeve

    A simple and sleek synthetic leather sleeve that can fit the 16 inch MacBook Pro. It features a soft material on the inside while the faux leather finish is available in four color options.

These are some of the best cases for your 16 inch MacBook Pro. If you’re looking for a brand new Mac, we’ve listed some of the best options that should suit your needs. We also have a roundup of the best Apple products for students who are looking for the perfect device during back-to-school shopping. Not an Apple person? Then take a look at some of the best laptops to buy in 2021 featuring great options in various categories.

    Apple MacBook Pro 16
    The 16 inch MacBook Pro is the largest MacBook currently available with the 9th-gen Intel processors going up to a Core i9, with 64GB of configurable memory and up to 8TB of storage.

The post These are the Best 16 inch Apple MacBook Pro cases: UAG, Supcase, Spigen, and more appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3ySAXEk
via IFTTT

Surface Pro 8: Release date, everything we know, and what we’re hoping for

It’s safe to say that the Surface Pro series is the most successful Microsoft Surface of all-time. Not only is it the most best-selling PC Microsoft makes, but it’s also the one that’s been most heavily imitated by the rest of the market. The next one in the lineup is going to be the Surface Pro 8.

Being that it’s so successful, the Surface Pro is a product that pretty much gets updated every year. In fact, there have been seven iterations — eight if you include the Surface Pro 7+, which should have been its own – since the first one launched in 2013. The Surface Pro and Pro 2 were too small, too thick, and too heavy though; it was the Surface Pro 3 where the product came into maturity.

Surface Pro 8 release date: When is it coming out?

While nothing is confirmed, it’s likely the Surface Pro 8 is coming later this year. Typically, there’s an event in early October, and then the product ships a few weeks later. The event is usually held in New York City, although it’s not clear if Microsoft plans on sticking to its online-only format for a while longer.

There’s something else coming later this year though, and that’s Windows 11. When Microsoft launched Windows 10 back in 2015, it held a big bang hardware event where it announced the Surface Pro 4, the original Surface Book, the Lumia 950, the Lumia 950 XL, the Lumia 550, and the Microsoft Band 2.

Three Lumia 950 XL units on stands

For Windows 11, there will also be a hardware event, obviously without the wearables and Windows phones. Still, there’s going to be fresh new hardware to show off the new operating system. The Surface Pro 8 should definitely be among that hardware.

One thing that’s still up in the air is where it will be sold. Unlike the early days, Surface is a global brand. But with global chip shortages, it’s possible there might be limited availability of the Surface Pro 8 at launch.

Surface Pro 8: What we’re expecting

To be clear, the Surface Pro 8 is an unannounced product. Anything you see here is based on rumors, speculation, and bits and pieces from sources. First, let’s look at some backstory.

Back view of Surface Pro 7

As mentioned above, the Surface Pro came into maturity with the Surface Pro 3 in 2014. That’s the one that looks and feels like the one you see today. With the Surface Pro 4 in 2015, it was made a bit thinner, and the screen was enlarged from 12 inches to 12.3 inches. There have been no major changes to the chassis since. There have been minor changes though, including the following:

  • The Surface Pro 6 added a Black color option, rather than the traditional Platinum.
  • The Surface Pro 7 ditched the Mini DisplayPort and replaced it with USB Type-C.
  • The Surface Pro 7+ has removable storage.

The Surface Pro 8 should be a bigger design change

For a design that has remained largely the same since the introduction of Windows 10 six years ago, you can expect that to change. Indeed, the Surface Pro 4 was Windows 10 hero hardware. It’s time for the Surface Pro 8 to be Windows 11 hero hardware. This also makes sense, since the Surface Pro 7+ had more improvements than plenty of previous Surface models, but it still wasn’t called the Pro 8. The Redmond firm has something better in mind.

Removable storage

The Pro 7+ got removable storage as a business feature, but now, it’s common in the Surface Laptop and Surface Pro X. It still won’t be recommended you upgrade your storage yourself. After all, Microsoft wants to charge absurd markups on storage increments.

Surface Pro 7+ removable storage

Really, this feature is made for businesses. It’s designed so if your Surface Pro 8 has sensitive information on it, you can remove the storage before it’s serviced. You can also destroy the storage when the device is recycled.

It should be the same design as the Pro X and Pro 7+, where you can pop open a hatch with a SIM tool.

A bigger screen with rounded corners

When the Surface Pro X originally launched, some assumed that was going to be the design of the next Surface Pro. That’s not quite the case. The Pro X is designed for ARM hardware, so it’s thinner and fanless. The Surface Pro 8 probably can’t get that thin.

Surface Pro 7+ front view

What’s more likely is it will be like a thicker Surface Pro X, as much as that draws a parallel to the original Surface Pro and the Surface RT. But that means we’ll get a bigger, 13 inch display, and thinner side bezels. Indeed, if you look at the bezels on a Surface Pro 7+, you can tell it’s a six-year-old design. That larger display will have rounded corners too, because after all, this is Windows 11 hardware, and a big part of Windows 11 design is rounded corners.

Like the Surface Pro X, I’d expect the top and bottom bezels to be larger. The bottom bezel is bigger because of the way the keyboard attaches. The top bezel is bigger to fit the webcam and IR camera. I’d expect the webcam to remain the same, since it’s been 5MP and capable of 1080p resolution since 2014, something that’s still rare to this day.

The Surface Pro 8 will get a spec bump

If you go out and buy a flagship Intel-powered laptop right now, you’d get 11th-gen processors, unless you bought a Surface Pro 7. Indeed, Microsoft kept the Surface Pro 7+ for businesses. It should be no surprise the Surface Pro 8 will get new Intel processors.

Surface Pro 7 face down

There are two main possibilities here. The first is Microsoft will use Intel 11th-gen processors like we’ve seen in the Surface Pro 7+. It would be similar to what the firm did with the Surface Pro 3. The immediate predecessor had the same CPU, but it had an all-new design. Intel’s 11th-gen chips are legit too. They come with Iris Xe graphics, support for Thunderbolt 4, faster memory, and more.

The other key possibility is that Microsoft could use 12th-gen processors, codenamed Alder Lake. Alder Lake should be on track for later this year, and while Intel’s schedule isn’t confirmed, it could announce 12th-gen mobile processors sooner rather than later.

Surface Pro 8: How much will it cost?

You can expect the pricing scale will be mostly the same with the Surface Pro 8 as it was with the Pro 7. This really isn’t something that changes, although it’s possible the base model will be more expensive if Microsoft offers 8GB RAM instead of 4GB in the base model.

Right now, the Surface Pro 7 starts at $749.99 for a Core i3, 4GB RAM, and a 128GB SSD. The next step up comes with a Core i5, 8GB RAM, and a 128GB SSD, and while the regular price is $899.99, it’s often discounted to $699.99. It maxes out at $2,299.99 for a Core i7, 16GB RAM, and a 1TB SSD; however, I’d expect the top-end Surface Pro 8 to cost more than that. The Surface Pro 8 will likely max out with 32GB of RAM like the Surface Pro 7+ does.

Surface Pro 8: The wish list

This is the fun part of the article, where I get to talk about what I want to see, rather than what I think is coming.

Thunderbolt 4

If I made a wish list for every one of the last four or five Surface Pro tablets, this would top every one of them. Thunderbolt 4 supports 40Gbps data transfer speeds, external GPUs, dual 4K monitors, all on a single USB Type-C port. It’s incredibly powerful, and every premium Intel-powered PC has it — unless it’s made by Microsoft.

Surface Pro 7 side view

Microsoft was even slow to adopt USB Type-C, something it finally added with the Surface Pro 7. But Thunderbolt makes this machine so much more versatile. You could connect an external GPU, turning this little tablet into a miniature gaming rig.

I’d also like to see Surface Connect go away. That’s been Microsoft’s proprietary port since the Surface Pro 3. It’s always been set to a USB standard, originally USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB 3.0 back then), and these days, it’s USB 3.2 Gen 2 for 10Gbps. Still, it’s no Thunderbolt, and indeed, Microsoft is the only company that’s still using a proprietary charging port in a device that requires less than 100W power. But if Thunderbolt 4 was included, there’d be legitimately no reason for anyone to ever use Surface Connect unless they’re using an old peripheral.

I also wouldn’t mind seeing USB Type-A go away. We’ve got two USB Type-C ports on the Surface Pro X, and it’s fine. Let’s ditch the legacy stuff and move forward.

5G

Both the Surface Pro 7+ and Surface Pro X offer 4G LTE, but it’s time to offer 5G. Again, this is something we’re seeing across the board, especially in business PCs, and for Surface, Microsoft will have consumer and business SKUs. Lenovo’s mainstream and premium ThinkPads, Dell’s premium Latitudes, and HP’s mainstream and premium EliteBooks all offer 5G.

To be clear, you’re not exactly missing out by getting a 4G LTE PC. For many Americans, 5G won’t even get you an improvement right now. Still, it’s worth it for future-proofing.

An anti-glare screen

Every single Surface PC has a notoriously glossy display. If not totally matte, maybe we can just do a bit better. Let’s look at it this way. In today’s day and age, a lot of people are working from home, and since we don’t all want to stay inside all the time, that turns into working from anywhere. It could be a coffee shop, the park, or even just in the backyard to get some fresh air and sunlight.

Surface Pro 7 with keyboard tucked under it

This would be a fine argument for 5G, but it also works for a less reflective display. Surface displays are just hard to use outdoors, and outdoor use is more important than ever.

A quieter keyboard and touchpad

Microsoft is a company that really loves its click sounds, something it used to advertise in early Surface Pro tablets. It’s noticeable if you click a touchpad on a Surface, especially in a quiet room. It’s borderline embarrassing.

Surface Pro Type Cover in Poppy Red

Every other company is working on quieter products. Let’s make this happen. I’d also love to see keyboard improvements. Some of the best keyboards around come from Lenovo and HP. I’d love to see Microsoft compete in this space, since that’s still our primary method for interacting with a PC.

Speaking of keyboard improvements, I’d like to see the pen stored and charged in the keyboard, like we see on the Surface Pro X. I wouldn’t mind a redesigned keyboard either, as the connectors haven’t changed, ever. You can use a Type Cover from the original Surface Pro and it will work with a Surface Pro 7+.

A high refresh rate screen

Windows 11 supports dynamic refresh rates, which can adapt to what you’re doing. However it gets done, it’s time for a high refresh rate display. We’ve seen it on Apple’s iPads for years now, and it’s popular on phones.

Here’s a better reason for it though. Gaming laptops have offered high refresh rate screens for years. That extra millisecond that buys you could make a difference in a game. Unfortunately, those screens tend to make other compromises, because it’s all about that gameplay. The Surface Pro 8 has an opportunity to be the PC that makes a high refresh rate about a better experience for everyone, not just gamers.

The post Surface Pro 8: Release date, everything we know, and what we’re hoping for appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3jTwPgX
via IFTTT