LightBlog

mercredi 1 juillet 2020

Google discontinues the Pixel 3a with the Pixel 4a nowhere to be seen

Google was expected to launch the Pixel 4a last month alongside the Android 11 Beta release. However, the launch was postponed due to alleged manufacturing delays and it’s now expected to launch later this month. While we still have no clear information from Google about the device or its release date, the company has now confirmed that the Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL from last year have been discontinued.

Pixel 4a XDA Forums

In a statement regarding the matter, a Google spokesperson told Android Police that the Google Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL will no longer be available on the Google Store, and the devices will only be available through a few third-party retailers till stocks last. The spokesperson revealed that the “Google Store has sold through its inventory and completed sales of Pixel 3a. For people who are still interested in buying Pixel 3a, the product is available from some partners while supplies last.”

If you head over to the official Google Store listing for the Pixel 3a series in the US, the devices are now listed as “Unavailable” for purchase. In India, the devices are still available for purchase on Flipkart, however, both the Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL are not deliverable in several locations. Even though the Pixel 4a is still nowhere to be seen, leaks and rumors about the upcoming device have revealed quite a bit of information about its design and specifications.

The latest reports about the Pixel 4a claim that the device will be priced at $349 and will not include the Active Edge feature that can be found on older Pixel devices. We suspect that the device will be powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 730 SoC and we’ve also seen the device compared to other Pixel phones in a performance test and camera review.

Rumored Google Pixel 4a Specifications:

  • Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  • GPU: Adreno 618
  • RAM: 6GB
  • Internal storage: 64GB(?), 128GB UFS 2.1
  • Display: Single hole-punch 5.81-inch display, 2,340 x 1,080 resolution, 443 dpi, 60Hz refresh rate
  • Rear camera: 12.2 MP Sony IMX363, f/1.73 aperture, 1.4µm pixels, OIS, EIS, LED flash, 4K video recording, Autofocus
  • Front camera: 8.0 MP Sony IMX355, f/2.0 aperture, 1.14µm pixels, EIS, Fixed focus
  • Connectivity: 4G, Dual SIM, GPS, WiFi 5, Bluetooth, GLONASS
  • Ports: USB Type-C, 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Security: Rear fingerprint sensor
  • Battery: 3,080 mAh
  • Software: Android 10

Source: Android Police

The post Google discontinues the Pixel 3a with the Pixel 4a nowhere to be seen appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3inhB2k
via IFTTT

The YouTube mobile app still limits video quality to 480p in India, even after 3 months of restrictions

COVID-19 has affected this year in a lot of ways, and we cannot even begin to assess the damage the pandemic has done at large. Even within the limited and narrow scope of smartphones and the related tech industry, the pandemic has made everyone rethink whether physical launch events are still needed when online-only events can serve as decent alternatives. The focus has shifted from physical experiences to digital experiences and combined with the health advisories issued because of the pandemic that advises people to stay indoors, we have witnessed a surge in online activity. Consequently, Internet service companies took pre-emptive steps to ensure that their infrastructure does not collapse—for instance, YouTube decided to restrict maximum video streaming quality to 480p in India in a move that many deemed to be temporary.

But three months have passed since YouTube’s decision. What was thought to be a temporary move in the greater public interest has now seemingly become a part of the “new normal”.

To recap, the official YouTube app for Android and iOS began restricting the maximum video playback quality to 480p back in late March 2020. These restrictions come into play even on videos that were uploaded in resolutions as high as 4K and which were previously playable at these qualities. YouTube did not communicate its decision initially, but other websites quote that YouTube has  “temporarily removed the option for users to manually select a resolution above 480p on mobile phones in India.” Some viewers initially blamed creators for uploading videos in 480p Standard Definition, but everyone soon realized that it was a platform-wide restriction, but specifically for India.

Youtube for Android low streaming quality Youtube for Android low streaming quality

The maximum video quality limit was put in place regardless of your Internet connection and quality, so it did not matter whether you are on mobile data (4G LTE) or on Wi-Fi connected through a fiber line. However, desktop users remain unaffected, and the same videos actually started off at a decently high 1080p by default on the same network. Further complicating the issue is the fact that even YouTube Premium users are affected! These are users that are actively paying YouTube for 480p streaming in 2020 for more than 3 months now!

Even at that point in time, we felt that the step down to a maximum ceiling of 480p was a little too harsh. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to several unprecedented situations, and we do understand that the step was taken in the greater interest of the public. A step down does alleviate what is deemed to be an avoidable load on Internet infrastructure, especially at a time when resources were getting stretched amidst the prevailing uncertainty. But still, 480p was too harsh of a downgrade to be considered a feasible maximum for a pleasant user experience, and I feel that 720p would have been a more acceptable middle-ground. But for the greater good, this temporary change was accepted without much protest.

However, it has been more than 3 months since the maximum quality restriction of 480p for YouTube streaming was rolled out. One cannot say that COVID-19 is under control—far from it—but for economic reasons, businesses have resumed activities with health guidelines in place. The nationwide lockdown that was announced in India back at the time of YouTube’s decision has been modified to become much more micromanaged in nature, focusing on districts and hotspots instead of blanketing the entire nation. Because of the relaxations, people do not have as much free time as they did back when the strict lockdown was freshly imposed. All the while, YouTube’s 480p restriction has continued in place without any communication from the company on a relaxation.

What complicates matters is that this restriction is specifically in India and has been India-only. What YouTube offered the rest of the world was a change in default behavior, defaulting videos to 480p but still retaining the option to choose a higher quality on a per-video basis. India does not get this option, and the only option available for streaming above 480p is to ditch the official mobile apps and explore other alternatives.

According to a report, YouTube had 265 million monthly active users in India as of February 2020. This is indeed a huge number, but it pales in comparison to the 2 billion monthly active users across the world. According to Alexa statistics for the last month, the U.S. is the leading source of YouTube traffic, contributing over 15% while India comes in second at 9% followed by Japan at 5%.

India’s presence as one of the top consumers does not go unnoticed, but I think it is unfair to single out only this country for a complete video quality restriction. YouTube could have uniformly applied the same maximum resolution restrictions in India as it did for the rest of the world, defaulting to 480p and letting users retain the option of increasing the quality. But as we know, that hasn’t been the case.

An argument can be made that India’s Internet infrastructure is not comparable to that of the USA or Japan, and that is true. However, YouTube has also failed to communicate how long these restrictions will continue to apply. There won’t be an overnight upgrade to India’s Internet infrastructure, and the COVID-19 pandemic is here to stay. So do we just grow accustomed to the pixelated lower quality for as long as the pandemic sticks around? There is no gameplan visible from YouTube on this end, despite the economy itself being restarted and people slowly getting back to work. According to a report from Medianama in May 2020, the spike in Internet traffic in India during the nationwide lockdown was less than expected at just 15%, and outdoor activities have been relaxed even further in June in India. Medianama‘s report further drives home the point that the restriction was not needed even during the initial days of India’s lockdown, which extrapolates into them being even more useless at this moment.

And it wasn’t just YouTube. Netflix had also downgraded its highest available bitrate, but this restriction was applied across the world. Netflix’s restriction was lifted in Europe sometime in May, and it was recently lifted in India as well. Even though the restrictions lasted longer for India, at least Netflix applied the cap uniformly and orchestrated the downgrade intelligently. YouTube’s blanket 480p video restriction just feels lazy in comparison, and the lack of communication has transformed YouTube’s temporary move into an indefinite stream of pixelated 480p content on our phones that the rest of the world can enjoy in up to 4K!

So to the good people at YouTube: Please consider this article as a collective rant from the Indian populace. It is absolutely no fun watching the latest Cyberpunk 2077 trailer in 480p while the rest of the world watches it in glorious 4K. Ideally, we hope that the restrictions are lifted up completely. But in case there are reasons that elude us, please at least consider upgrading us to 720p—that shouldn’t be a problem since you don’t even call it HD anymore. Otherwise, people will turn to alternatives and workarounds such as browsing YouTube through Chrome on mobile, using unofficial apps like NewPipe, or watching every video on desktop. None of these solutions are ideal and none of them are for the population en masse, so please let the solution come from you.

The post The YouTube mobile app still limits video quality to 480p in India, even after 3 months of restrictions appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3eTQUQv
via IFTTT

ASUS will announce the ROG Phone 3 on July 22nd at the “ROG Game Changer” event

The ASUS ROG Phone was one of the original “gaming phones” and the company has continued to improve the series. The ROG Phone II was launched about a year ago and we’ve been tracking its successor as of late. Now, thanks to a countdown posted on ASUS’ website, we know the ROG Phone 3 will be announced on July 22nd.

According to a listing last month by Chinese regulatory agency TENAA, we already have a very good idea of what the ROG Phone 3 will bring to the table. We’ve also recently seen the device leaked in a real-life photo, and ASUS has already begun teasing an announcement for the device’s upcoming launch.

Via: SlashLeaks

Just like with previous ROG Phones, the ROG Phone 3 boasts some very impressive specifications. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC (which could see an overclocked “Prime” CPU core) will be included along with 8, 12, or up to 16GB of RAM and 128, 256, or up to 512GB of storage. The display is a hefty 6.59-inches at FHD+ resolution and while the refresh rate is currently unknown, we expect to see 120Hz high refresh rate support at a minimum. In terms of cameras, we’re looking at a 64MP main camera, a 13MP secondary camera, and possibly a tertiary telephoto camera.

We’ve filled in all the known specifications we collected from the TENAA listing in the chart below. As you can see, this will likely be the most powerful Android smartphone on the market when it launches. ASUS has maintained a similar design with previous models, but the internals keep getting better. Stay tuned for the unveiling on July 22 at 11 AM ET.

Specification ASUS ROG Phone 3 (ASUS I003DD)
Dimensions & Weight 171 x 78 x 9.85 mm240g
Colors Bright Black
CPU & GPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  • 1x Kryo 585 (ARM Cortex A77-based) Prime core @ 3.091GHz
  • 3x Kryo 585 (ARM Cortex A77-based) Performance cores @ 2.4GHz (presumed)
  • 4x Kryo 385 (ARM Cortex A55-based) Efficiency cores @ 1.8GHz (presumed)

Adreno 650 GPU

RAM 8GB, 12GB, 16GB (LPDDR5 presumed)
Storage 128GB, 256GB, 512GB (UFS 3.X presumed)Non-expandable storage
Cameras
  • Rear
    • 64MP + 13MP + ?MP telephoto camera (up to 8X zoom?)
  • Front camera
    • ?MP
Display 6.59″, FHD+ resolution (2340×1080), AMOLED, no notch or hole-punch cutout
Battery & Charging 5800mAh (rated), 6000mAh (typ)30W fast charging
Connectivity
  • GSM: 900MHz,1800MHz
  • CDMA: 800MHz,1900MHz
  • TDSCDMA: 2GHz
  • WCDMA: I,Band 8
  • TDLTE: Band 38,Band 39,Band 40,Band 41(2555-2575 MHZ,2575-2635 MHZ,2635-2655 MHZ)
  • LTEFDD: Band 1,Band 3,Band 5,Band 8
  • NSA: Band 41,Band 78,Band 79
  • SA: Band 41,Band 78,Band 79
Ports USB Type-C, no 3.5mm headphone jack
Software Android 10 with ROG UI
Security Under-display fingerprint scanner

Source: ASUS

The post ASUS will announce the ROG Phone 3 on July 22nd at the “ROG Game Changer” event appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2AjXSzh
via IFTTT

The à la carte TV dream died before it ever got off the ground

Cordcutters are people who don’t subscribe (literally) to the traditional forms of TV. One of the biggest reasons for “cutting the cord” (ie. canceling your cable subscription) is the bloated channel lineups and inflated costs. Many people look at a long list of channels and see a lot of stuff they’ll never watch (but have to pay for). That’s where the dream of à la carte TV started, and for a while, it looked like it might actually happen. Not anymore.

À la carte TV is a pretty simple concept: You pay for what you want. In a perfect world, you would be able to pick the channels you want from a list and pay a price based on your selections. Only care about sports? Pick ESPN, FS1, and NBC Sports. Big comedy fan? Choose Comedy Central, TBS, and FX. For a multitude of reasons, that’s not really feasible, but a similar format was launched back in 2015 with Sling TV.

Sling TV arrived on the scene in 2015 with a modest 11-channel lineup and the low price of $20 per month. The idea was you pay $20 for a handful of basic channels and you could get add-on packages of channels for an additional $5. It offered a Sports pack, News pack, and Kids pack at launch. This wasn’t the perfect à la carte system (though they certainly advertised it as such), but it was the closest thing we had. I was one of the first people to try Sling TV, and as a cordcutting enthusiast, it felt like a big step in the right direction.

I mean…kinda?

Many OTT (over-the-top) internet TV providers have popped up since then. Playstation Vue was a big name for a while, but it shut down in early 2020. Hulu has its own live TV service now. YouTube TV is another very popular choice (more on that later). Sling TV is still around too, and there are a variety of niche services on the market as well. All the major services have one thing in common, though: bloated channel lineups and inflated costs. Sound familiar?

Nowadays, Sling TV starts at $30 per month and you get over 50 channels. It still offers add-on packages, but the service is now divided into “Sling Blue” (FOX) and “Sling Orange” (Disney), and only certain add-ons work with certain packages. The other popular services have add-ons as well, but they’re basically just for “premium” channels. The idea of getting a cheap basic channel lineup and building off of that is basically dead.

This week, YouTube TV announced a drastic price hike of $15, putting it at a lofty $65 per month. The service that launched with 50 channels for $35 per month now boasts over 85 channels at nearly double the monthly price. Google has added channels numerous times and price jumps have been a yearly occurrence. In the same week, FuboTV, AT&T, and DirecTV also raised prices. Sling TV, on the other hand, just announced a 1 year price freeze in response to its competitors’ price hikes, but who knows how long they can commit to charging $30/month? Each of these services tout offering “more entertainment” to justify their decisions, but customers never get the choice to opt-out and keep their current price. That’s exactly what cable TV has done for years and why many people cut the cord to begin with.

Including a lot of specifics to make this seem like a win

Services like Sling TV and YouTube TV were seen as potential “disruptors” to the archaic cable TV system. Maybe that’s how they started, but the TV industry seems to have slowly beaten them down. Cable companies are losing more subscribers every year, but if big companies like Google can’t step in and force real change, I don’t think the à la carte TV dream is ever going to happen.

Now, this doesn’t mean there are no benefits to OTT Internet TV services. YouTube TV still offers an extremely easy setup process and the ability to stream content on basically every device you own. Plus, you can pause your subscription at any time and pick it back up later. Meanwhile, cable companies will nickel and dime you for “broadcast TV” fees and send bulky equipment to your house. There are certainly benefits to OTT TV, but price and choice is not part of that equation anymore.

À la carte TV remains out of reach for cordcutters and current trends indicate it will remain that way for a long time. If you asked me 5 years ago if we’d have à la carte TV in 2020, I may not have thought it’d be perfect, but I certainly would have expected more progress. In many ways, it feels like we are actually further from that goal than we were in 2015. YouTube TV isn’t the only culprit, but it’s yet another promising service that has failed to make real change.

The post The à la carte TV dream died before it ever got off the ground appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2YQlULV
via IFTTT

Dish unveils new plans for Boost Mobile starting at $35

One of the stipulations for the Sprint/T-Mobile merger to be approved was that Boost Mobile, Virgin Mobile, Sprint’s prepaid business needed to be sold. Amazon was reportedly interested, but Dish Network eventually agreed to make the deal. Dish officially takes over starting today and they’ve announced new plans for Boost Mobile.

All of the aforementioned prepaid carriers now live under the Boost Mobile brand. To kick things off, Dish is trimming down Boost Mobile’s plans from three to two. The “$hrink-It!” plan offers 15GB of data for $45 per month and it can drop $5 in price after 3-6 weeks of on-time payments. The second plan offers 10GB of data and unlimited talk/text for $35 and no payment incentives.

Boost Mobile’s previous three plans were priced at $35, $50, and $60. The cheapest plan had caps on high-speed data and video streaming. The more expensive plans removed the caps and increased video streaming quality. We don’t have all the technical details for Dish’s new plans, but they seem to offer better value.

Dish also announced some updates on its 5G progress. It will be using Fujitsu for radio units and Altiostar and Mavenir for cloud-native, Open RAN software. As previously disclosed in the merger details, T-Mobile is also required to give Dish “robust” access to its network for 7 years while Dish builds out its own 5G network.

The new Boost Mobile plans will be available for customers starting tomorrow, July 2nd.


Source: Dish | Via: Android Police

The post Dish unveils new plans for Boost Mobile starting at $35 appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3ikz4s2
via IFTTT

Samsung just leaked the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra on its own site

Samsung’s Galaxy Note smartphones are some of the most exciting phones to look forward to every year. They combine the best hardware specifications with Samsung’s ever-lasting S Pen accessory. In the past few years, the Galaxy Note series also had some of the most interesting and colorful designs. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10 came in an Aura Glow color, which was one of the most iridescent and trippy colors I’ve ever seen. Thanks to new renders pulled from Samsung’s own website, we now have our first official look at the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in Mystic Bronze Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in Mystic Bronze

In these new images, which appeared on Samsung’s Ukrainian website (strangely enough at the bottom of the Galaxy Note8’s product page), we can see the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in its full “Mystic Bronze” glory. From the render, we can see the new camera setup along with the bronze color and matching bronze S Pen. The new camera setup is rumored to include a 108MP main sensor, 12MP ultrawide, and 13MP periscope zoom along with a laser autofocus module. Samsung did add a new bronze ring around each sensor for a more symmetrical look.

This color does seem to have a soft-touch look to it. This would be the second Samsung phone with a matte finish, the first being the BTS edition of the Galaxy S20+. Along with that, the S Pen does seem to look a little different. Leaker Ice Universe teased this year’s S Pen could be metal, which would explain the interesting look in the render. While we cannot see the display, we can see part of the curved edge. It’s a very slight curve that looks about as large as the curved edge of the Galaxy S20 but a bit steeper. The display is rumored to use an LTPO backplane and be a 6.9″ 3040×1440 resolution panel with support for a 120Hz refresh rate. It’s also rumored to have a centered hole-punch cutout like the Galaxy S20.

All around, I think these renders look really good. Unlike the Galaxy S20, which came in some of the blandest colors of 2020, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is already on a great start with a symmetrical, nice looking design. Hopefully, the rest of the device can hold up as well as the design. We’ll hopefully learn more about the Galaxy Note 20, Galaxy Fold 2, Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and other products at the rumored virtual Samsung Unpacked on August 5th.

H/T YouTuber Техно Гарри for first spotting this!

The post Samsung just leaked the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra on its own site appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/38g2vqP
via IFTTT

Samsung launches a UV sterilizer for phones and other gadgets

The COVID-19 pandemic has made many people more aware of their own hygiene habits. We’re washing our hands after bringing in packages, wiping down our groceries, and using hand sanitizer after touching doorknobs. Gadgets like smartphones and earbuds can be covered in nasty stuff too, which is why Samsung is launching a UV sterilizer.

Samsung announced the aptly named “UV Sterilizer” today in Thailand and it’s similar to other products on the market. It looks like a white plastic box with a lid and it can hold a smartphone (big enough for a Galaxy S20 Ultra), watch, wireless earbuds, or anything else you can fit inside. The box can wirelessly charge (10W) compatible gadgets while they are being sanitized as well.

To use the UV Sterilizer, simply put something inside, close the lid, and press the button. There’s an LED indicator light to show when it’s working and when the sanitizing process is complete. It uses UV-C light to kill up to 99% of germs and bacteria on both sides of whatever is placed inside.

This isn’t Samsung’s first venture with UV sterilization. You may remember back in March when the pandemic was first declared, Samsung began offering a sanitizing service for Galaxy devices in select regions. In a related hygiene initiative, Samsung released a handwashing app for Galaxy watches. So it’s not surprising to see the company launch its own UV sterilizer for gadgets.

Samsung is selling the UV Sterilizer for 1,590 baht (~$50) in Thailand. We’re not sure if they plan on bringing it to more countries, but it could be something that people would be interested in buying. Have you been doing anything to keep your gadgets clean?


Source: Samsung | Via: SamMobile

The post Samsung launches a UV sterilizer for phones and other gadgets appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/3ghTBf7
via IFTTT