LightBlog

vendredi 19 août 2016

Even more leaked images of the Moto Z Play surface

Screen Shot 2016-08-19 at 18.31.12

Instagram

The upcoming Moto Z Play isn't the best-kept secret by any means. We've already seen a few leaks, but this time, we also get a glimpse of the white variation.

Earlier this month, we reported that the Moto Z Play will be joining the recently-announced Moto Z family. China's TENAA certification gave us a sneak peek at the device itself, including some of its specs: the upcoming Moto Z Play will sport a 5.5 inch 1080p AMOLED display, a 2GHz octa-core processor, 3GB of RAM, and 64GB of internal storage, all powered by a juicy 3,510mAh battery. It's expected to have a 5-megapixel selfie shooter and a 16-megapixel rear camera.

The leak didn't stop there. We saw some photos of a prototype device just a few days after the TENAA certification. And now, the Moto Z Play is back again with even more photos, and it is a sexy-looking device as you can see below:

Design-wise, not much seems to have changed. Just like the Moto Z and the Moto Z Force, it has a fingerprint scanner on the front and a huge camera hump on the back. However, it seems as though the back of the Moto Z Play will be made of either plastic or glass instead of aluminum. Let's hope it's glass.

And of course, with Motorola's current focus on modularity, it wouldn't make sense if the Moto Z Play didn't support Moto Mod accessories. As you can see in the leaked images, the back of the device feature similar connector dots that we saw in the Moto Z and the Moto Z Force.

With it being a mid-ranger, the Moto Z Play may be the answer to the future of modular phones. One of the concerns with the Moto Z – or any other modular phone for that matter – is that modular accessories are simply way too expensive. If the phone itself is cheaper, however, perhaps consumers will be more inclined to cough up a few hundred dollars.

moto-z-force-vs-lg-g5-thumbSee also: Motorola Moto Z Force vs LG G5 – Modular or Mods?23

What are your thoughts on the Moto Z Play? Black or white? Would you rather get a more affordable phone to use with modular accessories? Let us know by commenting below!



from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2bR8ysJ
via IFTTT

US continues easing restrictions on ZTE as previous trade concerns wane

ZTE ZMAX Pro Review 7

Earlier this year, ZTE got hammered with a number of trade sanctions after the US Commerce Department suspected the Chinese tech company of handing over American technology to countries like Iran. Needless to say, this put ZTE in something of a tight position.

However, now the US government appears to be finding nothing particularly troubling as the investigation into ZTE. The sanctions came down in March, but just two weeks after they were issued, authorities gave the company a temporary reprieve that would allow them to continue doing business through June while their investigation into the matter continued.

ZTE Axon 7 Final-48See also: ZTE will unlock your Axon 7 or Axon Pro upon request24

As the June deadline approached, and the investigation into suspicions about ZTE's trade operations failed to unveil anything deeply troubling, the Department of Commerce extended the sanction until the end of August. Now with that deadline creeping up on us, the Department has elected to give ZTE yet another green light through November.

ZTE has been working closely with the US government and hopes to be emerge from this debacle with their reputation intact.

What do you think of ZTE and the Commerce Department's accusations of illicit trade? Does the company need to be restricted, or are these continued extensions evidence that research into their alleged violations are coming up empty handed? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

ZTE ZMAX Pro hands on 50Previously: Submit your idea for ZTE's crowd-sourced device21


from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2b6hiVH
via IFTTT

Pandora reportedly prepping September launch of Spotify competitor

pandoraThe battle of the music platforms continues to ramp up as major players are pulling out all the stops to make sure their tune provider becomes the go-to resource for all your jams. Long-time digital radio giant Pandora has decided that they're going to throw their hat into the dedicated subscription service circle, and it could arrive as early as September.

That's right. Over the previous months, Pandora has been quietly negotiating with a slew of record labels to build an on-demand streaming service that would pit it against the current big dogs in that field: Spotify, Apple Music, and Google Play Music.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the company is reaching the end of finalizing these agreements, so Pandora's subscription service is likely coming soon.

Apple Music vs Spotify vs Google Play MusicSee also: Apple Music vs Spotify vs Google Play Music85

We've known that Pandora had an interest in this endeavor for quite some time now. Even if the company hadn't have bought out Rdio last year, the writing is on the wall for specialized radio services. People are coming to expect curated playlists and custom music libraries to house their collections.

Although some are dubious of Pandora's ability to catch up after spending this long outside of the full library subscription model, they may be forgetting that the musical old timer has a hefty audience of users who are still on its free-with-ads model, meaning they have an excellent megaphone to get the attention of potential subscribers.

What do you think of Pandora's upcoming foray into the big leagues? Will they be able to match the competition, or are they doomed to follow the likes of Rdio? Let us know your take in the comments below!

pandoraPreviously: Pandora picks up failing Rdio for $75 million5


from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2bjOywm
via IFTTT

Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Samsung band together to kill automated telemarketing

Google LogoShutterstock

Who's this? Someone calling from an unknown number? This being 2016, it must be awfully urgent. You answer your phone only to have a ship's horn blare in your ear, then the jovial (if slightly grainy) voice of a recorded cruise ship captain tells you that it's your lucky day, because you might be eligible for the vacation of a lifetime!

Regulators are calling these increasingly common pre-recorded sales calls a "scourge," but the good news is that a slew of major tech companies have elected to put aside their respective differences in order to combat this greater evil.

Google Play Encryption AppsSee also: Police believe Google and Apple should censor encryption apps27

Being referred to tongue-and-cheek as the "Robocall Strike Force," this group includes the likes of AT&T, Alphabet, Verizon, Apple, Qualcomm, Microsoft, Samsung, T-Mobile, and Comcast. The team numbers more than 30 companies strong, and they have agreed to work in conjunction with the FCC to make these automated calls a thing of the past.

The group met for the first time this Friday, and they plan on reconvening with the FCC by October 19 with more concrete plans to put into effect. Although this initiative is still in its infancy, the team wants to increase caller ID verification standards and begin creating a "Do Not Originate" list that would make it harder for robocallers to impersonate banks, government agencies, or commercial entities.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler isn't one to mince words. "The bad guys are beating the good guys with technology," he said, "due in large part to industry inaction."

The bad guys are beating the good guys with technology.

"We have to come out of this with a comprehensive play book for all of us to go execute," said AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson. "We have calls that are perfectly legal, but unwanted, like telemarketers and public opinion surveyors. At the other end of the spectrum, we have millions of calls that are blatantly illegal."

What are your thoughts regarding this band of carriers, OS devs, network designers, device makers, and government agencies all coming together to take down the annoyance of robocalls? Will they be successful in their quest? Let us know what you predict in the comments below!

FCCTomWheelerNext: FCC, FTC examining how carriers release mobile security patches19


from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2b5W2iV
via IFTTT

Honor commits to at least 24 months of update support for new and existing devices

Huawei honor 8-3

New smartphones that pack attractive builds and neat components are always exciting for tech enthusiasts like ourselves. But it often is the case that once we get our hands on said phone and spend good time with it, the software experience can end up determining our ultimate satisfaction or remorse. Particularly, it's frustrating when companies don't give software updates the priority they deserve and that we want.

Fortunately, if you're a fan of Honor's developments as of late (Huawei's sub-brand), the company has just voiced its recognition over the importance of keeping software up to date. In an announcement dropped in the Honor Google+ page, a commitment to software updates for 'up to 24 months following each product launch' was outlined. It goes on to explain that the updates won't just be security improvements and bug fixes, but new features as well, 'at least once every three months during the first 12 months.'

Honor just launched the premium, affordable, US-bound Honor 8 smartphone, so this news is meant to be in conjunction with the promising release. You can now add reliable software updates as another plus to the phone's value. The word was meant specifically for the Honor brand, so we don't know if Huawei will adopt the same philosophy itself.

honor-8-hands-on-thumbSee also: Honor 8 hands on – a new stylish affordable flagship43

Now if only the big names in Android would join in as well. Are timely software updates a significant selling point to any Honor fans out there? Who's planning to give the Honor 8 a shot?

Next: Android 7.0 Nougat Update: When will get you it?



from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2bQk8nN
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 ad pitches it as an office on the go

It's no doubt that the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is one of the slickest devices currently on the market, but the angle Samsung is pushing doesn't have much to do with its processor or performance. No, the Korean tech titan wants you to know their latest device is Serious Business.

Well, maybe not so serious, but definitely business. Their TV spot for the device depicts a ragtag team of professional millennials getting work done on their Galaxy Note 7 smartphones (while they aren't watching videos or using Gear VR headsets).

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 7

  • Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Review
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 7 vs Nex...
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 7 vs App...
  • Galaxy Note 7 S Pen: everyth...

The ad showcases a variety of the device's capabilities, including its waterproofing. It even puts to rest a long-standing question tech bloggers have been asking: when would you ever need to take notes underwater? The answer: "Underwater Workspaces."

Case closed.

It's "the smartphone that thinks big," according to Samsung. Whether or not you'll be as productive as the company wants you to be with their device, there's no doubt users are appreciating its eye recognition security features, snappy interface, and brilliant display.

The device just hit shelves today. Will you be picking one up? Let us know your take on this device in the comments below!

Galaxy Note 7 - Gorilla Glass 5 Scratch Test 2Next: Corning responds to that worrying Galaxy Note 7 scratch test video126


from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2bQ78if
via IFTTT

BlackBerry files dual lawsuits in Florida against BLU products

BLU-R1-HD-review-22

BlackBerry is accusing Bold Like US, better known as BLU Products, of being a bit too bold. In a pair of lawsuit filing, the company claims that BLU Products infringed on BlackBerry patents and ignored an offer to license the tech in question.

In one of the two complaints, BlackBerry alleges that BLU's Android devices unlawfully leverage of a dozen of the Ontario-based firm's patents. Those include:

Patent 924 – method and apparatus for State/Mode Transitioning
Patent 060 – Method for Configuring a Telecommunication System
Patent 118 – Scattered Pilot Pattern and Channel Estimation Method for MIMO-OFDM Systems
Patent 567 – Detecting the Number of Transmit Antennas in a Base Station
Patent 034 – Method and System for Signaling Connection Release Indication
Patent 506 – Method and System for Signaling Connection Release Indication
Patent 335 – Systems, Devices and Methods for Training Sequence, Transmission and Reception
Patent 413 – Information Transmission Method, Mobile Communications System, Base Station in which ID Data is Reduced
Patent 868 – Software Code Signing System and Method
Patent 466 – Dynamic Bar Oriented User Interface
Patent 384 – Dynamic Bar Oriented User Interface
Patent 845 – Handheld Electronic Device Having Improved Phone Call Log and Associated Method
Patent 605 – Battery Disconnect System
Patent 149 – Handheld Electronic Device and Associated Method Providing Time Data in a Messaging Environment
Patent 449 – System Compositing Images from Multiple Applications

BlackBerry alleged that it offered BLU a FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) for licensing the patents cited in the complaints. But it stated that this offer was ignored. The complaints were filed in the US District Court in the Southern District of Florida, were Doral, Fla.-based BLU Products is headquartered.

With Blackberry slowly fading into obscurity when it comes to the handset market, it makes sense the company would turn to its software, patents, and enterprise expertise as a way to keep the company afloat. With more pressure applied on it, it's more than likely BLU will come around and settle with Blackberry.

What do you think of BLU's decision to ignore Blackberry? Is Blackberry just in its pursuit of a lawsuit? Let us know your thoughts down in the comments.



from Android Authority http://ift.tt/2bDzQzv
via IFTTT