LightBlog

dimanche 7 août 2022

These are the Best Fitness Trackers you can buy in 2022

Fitness trackers have evolved a lot over the years both in terms of the form factor and functionality. Modern-day fitness trackers are no longer limited to just tracking your daily steps and sleep duration. They’ve now become reliable tools for helping you get more active on a day-to-day basis, helping you get quality sleep, and even for tracking vital metrics like heart rate, oxygen levels, and more. As long as you’re ready to find the right product, these fitness trackers can help you achieve all your fitness goals with ease.

There’s no shortage of fitness trackers on the market, meaning you’ll have to skim through dozens of these products to find the one that aligns with your fitness goals. We’ve managed to put together a healthy list (no pun intended) of fitness trackers for you to check out. From simple trackers for day-to-day usage to more sophisticated options that double up as a smartwatch, there’s something for everyone on this list.

Navigate this article:

Dedicated Fitness Trackers

Dedicated fitness trackers a.k.a fitness bands primarily focus on fueling your fitness journey. These trackers are relatively small compared to a full-fledged smartwatch or the ones that also double as a smartwatch. You can find those products in the following sections, but let’s jump into the list of the dedicated fitness trackers that’ll help you achieve your fitness goals:

Best fitness tracker overall: Fitbit Charge 5

Fitbit Charge 5 on a beige background

Fitbit’s Charge lineup has been around for a while now and they continue to dominate the US market by offering a good set of features. It’s also one of the most affordable fitness trackers from Fitbit, and it comes with pretty much everything you expect from a basic fitness tracker. The Fitbit Charge 5, as you can see, has a simple yet elegant design. It’s available in a bunch of different colorways and we think it has the perfect size for most users. The housing of the tracker is made out of aluminum, glass, and resin, whereas the included band is made out of silicone.

It sports a bright 1.04-inch (diagonal) touchscreen OLED display on the front that lets you interact with all the features the tracker offers. Inside the Charge 5, you get more than a few sensors and components. It packs an optical heart rate monitor, red and infrared sensors for oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitoring, a device temperature sensor to measure the skin temperature, multipurpose electrical sensors compatible with the ECG app & EDA Scan app, a 3-axis accelerometer, and more. Notably, you also get built-in GPS, GLONASS, and NFC support.

The Fitbit Charge 5 also supports smart features like contactless payments, notifications, and more. The tracker also has built-in memory to store up to seven days of detailed motion data, minute by minute. Additionally, it can also store daily totals for up to 30 days. The Charge 5 is also water resistant up to 50 meters, which is great. In the battery department, Fitbit says the Charge 5 can work for up to 7 days on a single charge. Your mileage may vary based on your usage, and we expect the battery life to dip further with features like Always-On display and SpO2 monitoring turned on.

One of the best things about the Fitbit Charge 5 is that it’s compatible with both Android phones as well as iPhones. You’ll need an iPhone running iOS 14 or higher or an Android phone with Android 10.0 or higher to use the companion app. You can take a look at all the compatible devices by heading over to Fitbit’s official website.

All things considered, the Fitbit Charge 5 is a solid fitness tracker that offers a good set of features. It may not be the most affordable fitness tracker in this collection, but it gets the job done for a reasonable price. Fitbit has an exhaustive list of wearables on offer but we think the Charge 5 stands out as a reliable tracker. It doesn’t skimp on the essentials to keep the price low, which in itself is a huge selling point. We recommend taking a look at the Fitbit Versa 3 if you want a fitness tracker that doubles as a smartwatch. If you don’t mind settling for something that’s a little less premium then we think Xiaomi’s Mi Smart Band 7 is also a great option to consider.

    Fitbit Charge 5
    The Fitbit Charge 5 is a solid fitness tracker that offers a good set of features for the price.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Best budget fitness tracker: Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 7

Xiaomi smart Band 7

The Mi Smart Band 7 is the latest entrant in Xiaomi’s reliable line of fitness trackers. Mi Bands, for those that don’t know, are affordable fitness trackers that get the job done without breaking the bank. The Mi Band 7 being the latest entry into the lineup offers some noteworthy improvements over the predecessor. It made a debut in China by the name of Mi Band 7 but Xiaomi is referring to it as Mi Smart Band 7 in the international markets. It’s available to purchase in the US via Amazon for around $69. There’s a lot to like about the Mi Smart Band 7, especially at this price. It lacks some high-end features, but it makes up for it with other features while keeping the price low.

In terms of the design, we’re looking at a tiny oval-shaped device that’s detachable from its band. The tracker itself measures just 12.2mm in thickness and weighs 13g. This should give you an idea of how lightweight and comfortable it would be to wear it on a day-to-day basis. One of the best things about the Mi Band 7 is that it’s very easy to buy replacement bands for the tracker. Xiaomi itself sells a lot of them, and you’re bound to find a lot more from third-party vendors. The tracker lacks physical buttons, meaning you’ll have to interact with swipes and taps on the touchscreen. It sports a 1.62-inch AMOLED display on the front with 500 nits of brightness. The UI itself is fairly easy to navigate and find whatever you need.

As for activity tracking, the Mi Band 7 supports all the essentials including steps, workouts, sleep tracking, and more. It can also keep a track of your blood oxygen levels and heart rate. The highlight of the Mi Band 7 is that it can also track menstruation cycles, and breathing, which is great. The only real drawback is that the Mi Band 7 doesn’t automatically detect workouts, meaning you’ll have to manually log the exercise. However, the Mi Band 7 comes with a lot of workout modes including cycling, yoga, fishing, and even parkour. You’ll definitely find the right workout, but you’ll have to manually turn on tracking.

As we mentioned in our Mi Band 7 review, you don’t get an option to interact with the notifications on the tracker itself. This issue isn’t exclusive to the Mi Band 7 since a lot of other fitness bands and even smartwatches don’t actively let you interact with the notifications. It’s not necessarily a deal-breaker for something that costs as much as it does but keep that in mind. Some other noteworthy features of the Mi Band 7 includes a 180mAh battery and 5ATM resistance. You also get a reliable companion app that works with both Android phones as well as iPhones.

We suggest you read our Mi Band 7 review to learn more about this fitness tracker and get a good idea of what to expect from it before making a purchase decision.

    Mi Smart Band 7
    The Xiaomi Smart Band 7 is an affordable fitness tracker that does a good job of keeping track of steps, heart rate and sleep, with a large and vibrant screen too.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Best discreet fitness tracker: Oura Ring Gen 3

A person wearing the Oura Ring 3 in their index finger

Even the smallest fitness bands on the market including the Mi Band 7 aren’t as discreet as the Oura Ring. Unlike the vast majority of fitness trackers that are worn on the wrist, the Oura Ring, as the name suggests, is a ring. It lacks a screen and it doesn’t push notifications forward, meaning it’s less distracting compared to the traditional fitness bands. But don’t let its small form factor fool you because the Oura Ring is a very capable device that can track a lot of metrics to keep you in your best shape. We’re only adding this as a bonus option because it’s not for everyone. Coming in at $299, the Oura Ring Gen 3 is one of the most expensive trackers on this list and it also demands a paid membership to offer the best support. Yes, you get six months of free membership with your purchase but it’s $6.99 per month after that, which is a significant cost for most people.

The highlight of this product is its form factor and design. The Oura Ring Gen 3 comes in four different colors — Silver, Black, Stealth, and Gold. The company will let you choose the right size for a comfortable fit before checking out. The Oura Ring Gen 3 is made out of lightweight titanium, meaning it’s quite durable. It’s also lighter than a conventional ring, so you don’t have to worry about taking it off frequently. For those who are curious, the Oura Ring Gen 3 weighs 4 to 6 grams depending on the size of the ring and it can be as thin as 2.55mm. Despite its relatively small form factor, the Oura Ring Gen 3 is said to last for up to 7 days on a single charge. It uses Bluetooth LE (Low-Energy) for its connectivity.

The Oura Ring also offers a long list of features to help you stay in your best shape. With its membership, you get access to things like guided meditations, educational content, and personalized insights into your well-being. You can also choose to ignore the membership, but without it, you’ll only get access to the basic Oura Ring features like your Daily Readiness, Sleep, and Activity scores. Some premium features including the Relaxation time and Period Prediction are only available with the membership, but leave we’ll it up to you to decide while making a purchase decision.

Oura Ring works on both Android phones as well as iPhones and the app experience remains mostly the same across the board. It can also automatically sync your workouts from your favorite fitness apps through Apple Health and Google Fit. All the features and specifications, aside, what makes Oura Ring tracker special is its form factor. There really isn’t any other tracker like Oura, so it’s safe to say that the company is indeed dominating this space right now. The folks over at Oura are also constantly adding new features to the device, so it’s only going to get better over time.

    Oura Ring Gen 3
    The Oura Ring Gen 3 is the most discreet fitness tracker you can buy right now. It's one of the most expensive trackers in this collection, but it also supports a long-list of features for the price.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:


Smartwatch-style Fitness Trackers

Fitness trackers can also double up as smartwatches. There are a lot of these trackers on the market, but not all of them are worth considering. We’ve rounded up some of the best trackers in the category below:

 Best smartwatch-style fitness tracker: Fitbit Versa 3

Fitbit Versa 3

The Fitbit Versa 3 is our pick for the best smartwatch-style fitness tracker. While most people consider the Versa 3 as a smartwatch — even Fitbit puts it in the category of smartwatch — we think it’s better equipped to work as a fitness tracker. Unlike the “smartwatches” mentioned in this collection below, the Fitbit Versa 3 lacks dedicated app store support. Sure, you can install some apps but the selection is rather bleak compared to what you can get with, say, a Galaxy Watch 4. But if you prioritize fitness features over the app store, then the Versa 3 is a great option.

In terms of the design, we think the Fitbit Versa 3 resembles the Apple Watch with its square watch face. Physically, it’s a bit smaller than Fitbit’s own Sense smartwatch, but it offers more screen real-estate compared to fitness trackers like the Mi Smart Band 7 and the Charge 5. The Versa 3 is available in four different finishes, all of which have a different color on the case and the strap. The watch case is made out of aluminum while the included band uses a “flexible material”. The Versa 3 is water-resistant to 50 meters, meaning you can take a dip inside the pool while wearing it. Just like every other Fitbit tracker, the Versa 3 also works with both Android and iOS devices.

The Versa 3 is very similar to the Charge 5 in terms of features. What sets it apart from a tracker is its 1.58-inch AMOLED panel. It lets you see and interact with more information on the screen compared to a typical activity tracker. You can also see and interact with notifications, but the experience will probably be somewhat limiting compared to a full-fledged smartwatch like an Apple Watch. In terms of the sensors, the Fitbit Versa 3 gets continuous heart-rate monitoring and SpO2. This is in addition to the usual set of tracking metrics like step count, activity tracking, sleep tracking, and more. The Versa 3 also supports NFC for contactless payments, and it also has a built-in microphone that lets you take phone calls on the wrist.

The Fitbit Versa 3 also comes with built-in GPS and support for Alexa and Google Assistant. In the battery department, Fitbit says the Versa 3 can last about a week on a single charge. It’s on par with what the company claims for the Charge 5 too. You can, however, get a day’s worth of charge in just 12 minutes with the Versa 3. Overall, the Fitbit Versa 3 is a great option to consider if you’re looking to buy a reliable fitness tracker which also doubles up as a smartwatch. The Fitbit Sense is equipped with more sensors to track more metrics, but we think the Versa 3 offers a good set of features for the price.

The Fitbit Versa 3 is available to purchase for just $170 at the time of writing this article, and we think is a solid price for everything it brings to the table.

    Fitbit Versa 3
    The Fitbit Versa 3 is very similar to the more expensive Fitbit Sense smartwatch, except this one brings all the essential features for a relatively affordable price.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Best budget fitness watch: Amazfit Bip S

Amazfit Bip S

If you don’t want to spend a lot of money on an expensive fitness watch, then we recommend checking out the Amazfit Bip S. It’s an excellent choice for those who want to save some moolah without compromising on some essential features. The Bip S, as you can see, has a square watch face which makes it look like a budget Apple Watch of sorts. It’s available to purchase in either Carbon Black, Red Orange, Warm Pink, or White Rock colors, so you get a decent amount of options. It’s made out of polycarbonate material while the included strap uses silicone. The Bip S only weighs 31g with the strap, so it’s not too heavy on the wrist either.

The Amazfit Bip S sports a 1.28-inch color TFT panel on the front with a resolution of 176 x 176 pixels. It’s covered with 2.5D Gorilla Glass 3 for protection, and the watch comes with a 5ATM waterproof rating. In terms of the sensors, we’re looking at a BioTracker PPG Bio-tracking optical sensor. In addition to the usual set of health metrics, the Bip S also supports sleep tracking and continuous heart rate monitoring. It also has a built-in GPS, which makes it better than a lot of other fitness watches in this price range. One of the highlights of the Bip-S fitness watch is that it has a long-lasting battery. It’s rated to last for up to 2 weeks on a single charge, which is quite good. It’s on par with fitness trackers like the Mi Smart Band 7 in the battery department.

What’s impressive about the Amazfit Bip-S is it’s said to last for up to 40 days on a single charge with basic usage. According to the company, “basic usage” includes factory default dial, heart rate measurement every 30 minutes, sleep tracking, and up to 100 notifications per day lighting up the screen. You can also exercise once a week for up to 30 minutes with the GPS turned on to net around 40 days of usage on a single charge. If you were to use GPS all the time, then you’ll end up looking for a charger before the end of the day.

The Amazfit Bip-S works with both Android phones and iPhones via the companion app called Zepp. The Amazfit Bip-S works more like a fitness band than a smartwatch, so keep that in mind. You do get notifications on the watch but there’s very limited room when it comes to interacting with those notifications. You can, however, edit watch faces and control music, so there’s still some degree of customization and functionality to it.

Put frankly, the Amazfit Bip-S isn’t the best-looking fitness watch in this collection, but we think it offers good value for the price. It’s available for just $42 at the time of writing this article, meaning it’s cheaper than the Mi Smart Band 7 too. The Bip-S can also handle activity tracking, so it may be worth considering for those who’re just starting their fitness journey.

    Amazfit Bip S
    The Amazfit Bip S is an affordable smartwatch-style fitness tracker that offers a good value for the price.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:


Best Smartwatches for Fitness

Fitness trackers aren’t the only game in town. Smartwatches can also offer great features for fitness enthusiasts. There are many advantages to buying a smartwatch over a basic fitness tracker including better notification support, a dedicated app store, and more

Best smartwatch for Android users: Samsung Galaxy Watch 4

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 with red bands on wrist

If you use an Android phone — particularly one made by Samsung — then the Galaxy Watch 4 is one of your best options. This is a great smartwatch that’s packed with a lot of awesome features. One of the best things about this watch is that it’s currently the only smartwatch on the market running Wear OS 3. Additionally, Samsung has also added a lot of fitness features to it, making it a solid option to consider for those who want a reliable watch for fitness. Samsung may have ditched the ‘Active’ branding from its watch lineup this year, but the Galaxy Watch 4 picks up many of those features while keeping a sporty look and feel.

We recommend picking up the regular Galaxy Watch 4 model over the ‘Classic’ one as it’s better suited for fitness enthusiasts. The regular Galaxy Watch 4 model is available in 40mm and 44mm sizes, both of which are smaller and cheaper compared to the ‘Classic’ variants. The 40mm variant weighs almost 26 grams while the 44mm variant weighs 30 grams. You can get the Galaxy Watch 4 in Black, Silver, Pink Gold, and Green color options. Besides the obvious size and design differences, the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic comes with a physical rotating bezel. In terms of specifications, the Galaxy Watch 4 is powered by Samsung’s in-house Exynos W920 chipset with 1.5GB RAM and 16GB onboard storage. It also packs a  3-in-1 health sensor for measuring heart rate, ECGs, and reading body composition.

The body composition analysis is a unique feature that no other smartwatch on the market currently supports. It essentially sends a weak current through your body to analyze body fat percentage, body mass index, muscle and bone mass, and more. In addition to that, the Galaxy Watch 4 also supports activity tracking. You can use the watch to track a variety of indoor and outdoor activities. In fact, the Galaxy Watch 4 also supports automatic workout-tracking which eliminates the need to manually log a workout session. Samsung has also beefed up the sleep tracking feature with this watch. It now measures blood oxygen levels every minute overnight compared to once every 30 minutes on the previous gen watch. The Galaxy Watch 4 also comes with a stress app to show your stress levels.

The battery life of the Galaxy Watch 4, as you’d expect from a full-fledged smartwatch, isn’t anything to write home about. If you’re actively using your smartwatch to check and interact with notifications, workouts, heart-rate monitoring, etc; then you’ll have to charge it every day. You can squeeze more out of the Galaxy Watch by disabling the Always-On display, but it’s probably not going to do much to keep the lights on for more than, say, a day and a half or two.

The Galaxy Watch 4 stands out from other fitness trackers in this collection by offering solid app store support and tons of customization options. It’s a great smartwatch for your day-to-day usage that also happens to be a reliable fitness tracker.

    Samsung Galaxy Watch 4
    The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 is currently one of the best smartwatches on the market for Android users. It's also packed with a ton of fitness features, which makes it a reliable activity tracker too.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Best smartwatch for iPhone users: Apple Watch Series 7

Apple Watch Series 7 with dumbbells and iPad

The Apple Watch Series 7 should be on top of the list for iPhone users when it comes to fitness-centric smartwatches. It may not be a worthy upgrade over, say, the Apple Watch Series 6, but there’s plenty to like if you’re a new Apple Watch user. It looks very similar to a lot of other Apple Watch models that are available on the market. The corners are slightly rounded on the Apple Watch Series 7 but you’re looking at a familiar design overall. There’s a 1.9-inch display on the front which is up to 20-percent larger than the Series 6. According to Apple, the Series 7 watch is also brighter in always-on mode.

The Apple Watch Series 7 is good for up to 50 meters of water. Notably, this is the first Apple Watch to earn an IP6X certification for dust resistance too. The glass covering the screen is also said to be more durable than ever, meaning it’s a great option for those who have an active lifestyle. One of the best things about the Apple Watch is that it’s extremely reliable when it comes to activity tracking and just fitness in general. The Apple Watch Series 7 is capable of tracking all the basic metrics including steps, calories, floors climbed, and more. It can also monitor your heart rate, sleep, blood oxygen levels, and menstrual cycle. The Apple Watch is also known to be very reliable when it comes to tracking all the metrics.

Apple’s watchOS is also full of useful health and wellness features. It doesn’t support the Galaxy Watch 4’s body composition analysis, but you can expect to see pretty much all the other fitness features. It’s an excellent fitness tracker that monitors your heart rate, counts your steps, and even tracks your distance covered with GPS. Not to mention it also offers support for a ton of workouts including Tai Chi. The Apple Watch Series 7 is also better than ever when it comes to cycling, as the company is said to have tweaked the algorithm to accommodate more metrics. And just like a lot of other fitness trackers on the market, the Apple Watch can also automatically track your workouts. This is a great feature to have as you don’t have to manually start the tracker before starting an activity.

The Apple Watch Series 7 isn’t a lot different in the battery department compared to other smartwatches. It can last up to two days on a single charge, but you’ll have to disable some of the popular features to log those 48 hours. If you’re somebody who’s actively using the watch for activity tracking, checking and interacting with notifications, and more; then you’ll have to charge it almost every day. It’s safe to say that it’s on par with the Galaxy Watch 4 in this regard. What we like the most about the Apple Watch is how easy it is to charge this device. You can drop it on the magnetic charger that comes bundled with the watch, and it charges 33-percent faster than the Apple Watch Series 6.

    Apple Watch Series 7
    The Apple Watch Series 7 brings a few key additions to an already-great smartwatch and makes it even better.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Best rugged smartwatch for fitness: Garmin Instinct 2

Garmin Instinct 2

The Garmin Instinct 2 is an excellent option for those who are looking to pick up a rugged smartwatch. The new Instinct 2 takes the best features of its predecessor and adds some meaningful upgrades to offer a better package overall. The Instinct 2 is available in 40mm and 45mm case options, so it’s suitable for most users out there. You also get to choose between the standard or the Solar models, with the latter being able to gather energy from the sun with the help of Garmin’s Power Glass. The Power Glass extends the battery life further, so you might want to pick that one if you want the best battery life. The Solar models are slightly more expensive, though, so keep that in mind.

While the original Instinct smartwatch was also available in a range of colors, the Instinct 2 brings brighter shades, including the poppy red and electric lime colorway. You can even get some dual-shade options with Surf edition if that’s something you like. Just like the original watch, the Instinct 2 also comes with a monochrome memory-in-pixel display with a circular watch face. There’s also a small circular cutout within the main panel to show some contextual information as you’re navigating through menus. The Instinct 2’s display is a lot sharper compared to its predecessor. We’re looking at 176 x 176 pixels compared to 128 x 128 pixels for the original watch. This should make a noticeable difference in day-to-day usage.

The Garmin Instinct 2 is great when it comes to activity tracking. It comes with an exhaustive list of health monitoring features including Garmin’s Body Battery tool. This tool, in case you’re wondering, tracks various metrics, including heart rate, sleep, and more to tell you how much energy you have left for the day ahead. The best thing about this score is that it’s updated throughout the day, which means you can balance your activities to make sure you don’t run out of juice before the end of the day. The Instinct 2, just like the other Garmin watches, offers accurate GPS support to track your outdoor activities better.

Notably, the Garmin Instinct 2 also comes with a multi-sports mode for events like triathlons, which means you don’t have to stop and change the activity mode between each stage. The Instinct 2 smartwatch can also detect a range of activities by itself, which is always a great feature to have. This particular watch is better suited for runners, cyclists, and swimmers, but you should be able to track other workouts without any issues either. It comes with a 10ATM water rating which means you can use in rain or even take it underwater for a swim. Other noteworthy features of the watch include a microphone that lets you take phone calls or summon your phone’s voice assistant from your wrist. The companion app also makes it easier for you to download additional watch faces and applications.

Despite offering a long list of features, the Garmin Instinct 2 is great when it comes to battery life. According to the company, the Instinct 2 smartwatch is said to last for up to 28 days on a single charge. That might be a bit of an exaggeration, especially if you use some battery-draining features such as SpO2 and GPS. But even without those features enabled, the Instinct 2 should be able to keep up for more than two weeks on a single charge, which is quite impressive. The Solar model will definitely last longer between charges, so keep that in mind. Overall, the Garmin Instinct 2 is a great option to consider if you’re in the market for a reliable, rugged smartwatch for fitness.

    Garmin Instinct 2
    The Garmin Instinct 2 takes all the best features from the original Instinct smartwatch and adds some finishing touches to make it better.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:


Closing Thoughts

As you can see, there’s a lot of variety to choose from, but this list should help you narrow down your options. If you’re leaning towards buying a simple activity tracker then the Fitbit Charge 5 and the Mi Smart Band 7 are great options to consider. The Fitbit Versa 3 and Amazfit Bip-S are great for those who want fitness trackers that also double up as a simple smartwatch. But if you want more exhaustive features including full app store support, then you’ll have to rely on the smartwatches mentioned in this list.

This is an ever-evolving list that we’ll update over time to add newer and better options. But in the meantime, let us know your favorite fitness tracker by leaving a comment down below.

The post These are the Best Fitness Trackers you can buy in 2022 appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/4iE0lfF
via IFTTT

Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa Review: The best smart speaker to put at the side of your bed

In a world where a smartphone is charging on every nightstand, the humble alarm clock is a bit of an antique. Or is it? Lenovo certainly doesn’t think so with its now second attempt at a smart clock that’s part smart speaker. The first one, the Smart Clock Essential, came with Google Assistant. The sequel makes the switch to Amazon’s Alexa voice assistant.

XDA Recommended Award Badge

That makes it less of a proper sequel, more like a spin-off. If you own and love the original and you use Google Assistant, you don’t necessarily want to get this one. And you don’t need to, either. Despite an updated design, the two devices remain simplistically similar. But if you prefer Alexa over Google Assistant, as I do, it becomes a more attractive proposition.

The obvious use case is in the bedroom, a modern take on the classic alarm clock. But in essence, this is an Amazon Echo at heart, albeit made by Lenovo. So you can use it anywhere you like, and for more than just telling the time.

    Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa
    A modern take on a traditional alarm clock with the added power of Alexa. And no camera so it's perfect for the bedroom.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Navigate this review:

Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa specs

Specification Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa
Processor
  • Amlogic A113X
OS
  • Linux/Alexa built-in
RAM
  • 4GB
Display
  • Digital LED (monochrome, non-touch)
Connectivity
  • WiFi 5 802.11 b/g/n
  • Bluetooth 5.1
Weight
  • 249g
Dimensions
  • 93.3mm x 113.48mm x 71.33mm / 3.67″ x 4.46″ x 2.80″
Color
  • Clay Red
  • Misty Blue

About this review: This review was written using a Smart Clock Essential with Alexa provided by Lenovo. At no point has Lenovo had any input on the content of this article. 


Pricing and Availability

The Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa is available to purchase now from Lenovo directly and other third parties such as Amazon. The regular price is $69.99, though there are frequent deals that have taken as much as $25 off that.

It comes in two colors; Misty Blue and Clay Red.


Design and Features

  • Same simplistic approach as its predecessor.
  • Substitutes Google Assistant for Alexa.
  • Bright display with additional glanceable information.
  • The sound quality is a little behind the Echo Dot.

Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa

I bought and lived with the original Lenovo Smart Clock Essential. It was great. Exactly the type of smart device I’d been looking for to put on my nightstand. The key to that was not having a camera or a full display. I wanted to be able to see the time through half-open 6.30 a.m. eyes, play music, and ask the usual basic smart speaker questions. For me, the only drawback was a preference for Alexa. As a result, rather than using two assistants in the same house, I ended up replacing it with the Amazon Echo Dot with Clock. As a nightstand device, I like the Echo Dot less than I like the Lenovo Smart Clock Essential.

The best part of this new Smart Clock Essential is that all the good bits remain. All the reasons you would choose it to go on your nightstand are still here. The clock is large and easily legible through sleepy eyes. There’s no camera, the physical controls are easy to feel around for and it doesn’t have a touch screen. It’s simple. And thankfully Lenovo kept that simplicity.

Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa

Despite not having a full-touch display, the Smart Clock Essential is a little more advanced than the clock-toting Echo Dot. You get a little more glanceable information, including the current weather conditions temperature, and humidity, saving one more morning question for Alexa. It even has a rudimentary decibel meter. The display also has an auto-dim feature, so at night you’re not going to be lighting up your bedroom. In this version, that display is trimmed with a redesigned housing that makes it a little bigger than the old model, but hardly large. It’s still going to take up less room on your nightstand than an Echo Show 5 or a Google Nest Hub. It comes in two colors, blue or red, trimmed in fabric.

The hardware controls all live along the top edge and it’s the usual fare. You get hardware volume controls, an action button to trigger Alexa, and an alarm button. This is an important feature retained from the original model, after all, it’s an alarm clock. You can use your phone or you can use the button. And silencing the alarm with your voice works just the same as on any Amazon Echo. The only hardware control not on the top is the mute switch, which is awkwardly placed on the back by the power input. You won’t accidentally activate it, at least, but you can’t just roll over and tap it.

Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa and Amazon Echo Dot with Clock

The sound quality is good, though if you’ve used the latest generation Echo Dot you might be a little disappointed. For what it is though it’s not bad and certainly loud enough to wake you up with your favorite tunes. Being an Alexa device, it has the same setup process using the Alexa app as an Amazon Echo and most of the same benefits. The setup isn’t quite as seamless, and it’s not made immediately obvious that you have to choose “clock” not speaker. It’s also a little disappointing that some of the custom Amazon Alexa alarms, like The Grand Tour, aren’t made available to the Smart Clock Essential.

There’s also no audio output on the Smart Clock Essential with Alexa. It’s not a deal-breaker for the type of device this is meant to be, but it isn’t an option to add some smarts to an existing home audio setup.


Who should buy the Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa

Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa

  • Someone who wants a smart device on the nightstand without a camera.
  • If you prefer Alexa over Google Assistant.
  • If you’re looking for a better clock than the Echo Dot can offer.

The Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa is a simple device and a solid alternative to the Amazon Echo Dot with Clock. As a device for a nightstand or even an office desk, somewhere you genuinely want a glanceable clock, it’s the better choice. The display gives you the essential information without becoming a distraction.

If better quality sound is important then the Lenovo falls behind a little, but it’s hardly a huge difference. Both have an excellent range on their microphones, too. And of course, if you prefer Alexa over Google Assistant, this is the one to get over Lenovo’s other model.

    Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa
    Lenovo's smart clock packs Alexa-powered smarts, decent sound, attractive design and a great price into one neat little box for your nightstand.

It’s a device that at first glance you might not get too excited for, but that does it a disservice. As an affordable smart speaker, it’s most excellent, especially if you’ve been looking for that perfect nightstand device that doesn’t have a camera.

The post Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa Review: The best smart speaker to put at the side of your bed appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/FNzA3GC
via IFTTT

I’ve tried many wireless earbuds, but I still return to AirPods

Throughout the course of my working day there is one constant: headphones. I’m either listening to music, a podcast, the news, or on a Google Meet call basically all day. And I also like to be able to move about without missing anything, so they have to be wireless. Since over-the-ear headphones can get tiring, I use wireless earbuds most of the day.

And for those, I have finally resigned myself to using Apple AirPods. Specifically, at least for now, the second generation AirPods. The wireless earbuds that I ridiculed when first announced are my favorite and by a fairly wide margin now.

This is actually my second pair of AirPods after the first met an untimely death at the hands of our washing machine. In between, I’ve tried and enjoyed a lot of alternatives, but ultimately ended up back where I started. It might say more about me than it does about the AirPods, but I’m still a little surprised.

The alternatives to AirPods

huawei freebuds pro 2

I am pretty terrible at buying headphones. I wouldn’t ever claim to be an audiophile, but I love music and I seem to enjoy earphones. And after my initial spell of ridicule, I tried AirPods and instantly fell in love with them. But when I left them in a pocket and destroyed them in the washing machine, I decided to try out the competition first instead of just replacing them with a second pair.

I won’t list everything I’ve tried, it’ll get way too boring. But brands like Razer, Xiaomi, Amazon, and Huawei are all in there, as well as some smaller ones such as Anker’s Soundcore. I only ever came across a couple of pairs of wireless earbuds I really didn’t like, but none I liked as much as AirPods.

The closest was Huawei’s FreeBuds Pro. Everything about them is great. The sound quality is superb, the ANC is very good, they’re not actually too expensive and the battery life is at least comparable to Apple’s. The FreeBuds Pro is actually more feature-packed than my AirPods since I went for the regular old second-generation ones.

But none of that or anything offered by any wireless earbuds has mattered as much as what the AirPods can offer to me: comfort.

AirPods just fit my ears

iPhone SE 2022 Product Red and AirPods

This is where it might say more about me than anything else. Perhaps my ears are built differently, but no other wireless earbud fits me as well as the AirPods do. The combination of the shape and the weight and the lack of a silicon tip makes the AirPods just nestle into my ears better than anything else. And this has been the case since Apple included the EarPods in the box with the iPhone.

I can sacrifice ANC, I can sacrifice a little on the sound quality. Purely because these seem to be the only buds that actually fit me. With all the others I’ve tried, even the FreeBuds Pro which I did come really close to sticking with, my ears feel fatigued after a couple of hours. With the AirPods, I can pop them in and forget they’re there, which is important to me and my daily routine.

If I want to really enjoy a piece of music, I reach for my favorite over-ear headphones, currently the Audio Technica ATH-M50X. But I don’t want to wear those all day. They’re wired, and for podcasts and meetings, they’re overkill. For everything else I use AirPods. They sound surprisingly good given their size and since I work at home on my own all day, I don’t miss ANC.

I carry an iPhone and I’ve recently moved to working on a Mac again, and using AirPods helps to appreciate how tight Apple has its ecosystem integration down. Switching between the two is so absurdly seamless, it’s almost like magic (and yes, I feel dirty using that word).

So, that’s me. I’m an AirPods guy now. Or I will continue to be assuming Apple doesn’t radically change the design down the line. My ears just seem to be designed for them. I’m sure Tim Cook is thrilled.


    Apple AirPods (2nd Gen)
    Apple's now iconic earbuds sound good, are stupendously easy to live with and the previous generation model is now pretty affordable.

If you have a favorite pair of wireless earbuds right now, toss it into the comments section below and tell us what makes them just right for you.

The post I’ve tried many wireless earbuds, but I still return to AirPods appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/W7EoAXH
via IFTTT

samedi 6 août 2022

Google Pixel 6a vs Google Pixel 6: Which Google phone should you prefer as your next device?

The Google Pixel 6 is one of the best camera smartphones on the market. It offers the same primary camera sensor and the processing package as its more pricey sibling, Pixel 6 Pro, while being $300 cheaper. But with the introduction of the affordable Pixel 6a, the regular Pixel 6 has some serious competition. The Pixel 6a is essentially a watered-down version of the Pixel 6, offering the same general design and Tensor chipset for $150 less. But which one is the better buy? We try to find an answer in our Pixel 6 vs Pixel 6a comparison.

Google Pixel 6a vs Google Pixel 6: Specifications

Specification OnePlus 10 Pro Google Pixel 6
Build
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Gorilla Glass 3 on front
  • Plastic back
  • IP57 water and dust resistance
  • Aluminum mid-frame
  • Gorilla Glass 6 back
  • Gorilla Glass Victus front
  • IP68 water and dust resistance
Dimensions & Weight
  • 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9mm
  • 178g
  • 158.6 x 74.8 x 8.9 mm
  • 207g
Display
  • 6.1-inch AMOLED
  • FHD+
  • 60Hz
  • 20:9 aspect ratio
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3
  • Always on Display
  • 6.4-inch AMOLED
  • 1080 x 2400
  • 90Hz refresh rate
  • HDR10+ support
SoC
  • Google Tensor
  • Google Tensor
RAM & Storage
  • 6GB RAM
  • 128GB flash storage
  • 8GB RAM
  • 128GB/256GB UFS 3.1 storage
Battery & Charging
  • 4,410mAh
  • 18W fast charging (charger not included in the box)
  • No wireless charging
  • 4,614mAh
  • 30W wired fast charging (charger not included in box)
  • 21W wireless charging
Security Optical in-display fingerprint sensor Optical in-display fingerprint sensor
Rear Camera(s)
  • Primary: 12.2MP main
  • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide
  • Primary: 50MP wide, f/1.9
  • Secondary: 12MP ultra-wide, f/2.2 aperture
Front Camera(s) 8MP 8MP
Port(s)
  • USB Type-C
  • No headphone jack
  • No microSD card slot
  • USB Type-C
  • No headphone jack
  • No microSD card slot
Audio
  • Stereo speakers
  • Stereo speakers
Connectivity
  • 5G NR
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
  • Bluetooth 5.2
  • NFC
  • 5G (mmWave)
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.1
  • NFC
Software
  • Android 12 with Pixel Launcher
    • Three major Android OS updates promised
    • Four years of security patches
  • Android 12 with Pixel Launcher
    • Three major Android OS updates promised
    • Four years of security patches
Other Features
  • eSIM and Nano SIM
  • eSIM and Nano SIM

Google Pixel 6a vs Google Pixel 6: Design & display

It’s easy to mistake the Pixel 6a for the Pixel 6 as they share a common design and look quite similar. Both feature a two-toned back with a striking black camera visor at the top that covers the width of the phone. Both have a two-toned back with a prominent black camera visor that spans the width of the phone. The Pixel 6a features a smaller camera bar and protrudes less than the Pixel 6. Nevertheless, a case is necessary for both phones to protect the camera bump. The Pixel 6 and Pixel 6a are among the more unique-looking phones on the market. They stand out from the crowd due to their distinct personalities and will undoubtedly turn heads.

Google Pixel 6a in all three colors on wooden table.

Being an affordable offering, the Pixel 6a opts for fewer premium materials. It has Gorilla Glass 3 on the front and a plastic back with a finger-resistant coating. The Pixel 6 has Gorilla Glass Victus on the front and Gorilla Glass 6 at the back, along with an aluminum frame.

Both phones are dust and water-resistant, though their IP rating differs. The Pixel 6a has an IP67 rating, whereas the Pixel 6 has a slightly higher IP68 rating. Neither phone has a microSD card slot nor a 3.5mm audio port.

The Pixel 6 flaunts a 6.4-inch AMOLED display with full HD+ resolution, while the Pixel 6a has a smaller 6.1-inch FHD+ OLED panel. While both are OLED panels with the same resolution, the Pixel 6 panel has an edge as it can refresh at up to 90Hz, offering a smoother scrolling experience. The Pixel 6a panel, on the other hand, tops out at a 60Hz refresh rate. Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+ content.

Cameras

Camera module of the Google Pixel 6a

The biggest difference between the Pixel 6 and the affordable Pixel 6a is the camera setup. While earlier Pixel A series came with the same camera setup as the flagship Pixel lineup, things are different this time. The Pixel 6a is a downgrade from the Pixel 6 in terms of camera hardware.

While the Pixel 6 gets the brand new 50MP Samsung GN1 sensor, the Pixel 6a uses the same 12.2MP primary sensor that has been used on prior Pixel phones, including the Pixel 4 series and Pixel 5.

Despite having older camera hardware, the Pixel 6a still provides amazing camera performance due to Google’s excellent image processing and the new image signal processor. However, as we noted in our review, the smaller sensor can struggle with low-light and night shots and lags behind the Pixel 6’s superior 50MP camera. Both phones can shoot 4K 60fps videos, but the Pixel 6 delivers better quality footage.

We have attached camera samples from both phones in the galleries below.

Pixel 6a camera samples

Google Pixel 6a

Pixel 6 Pro camera samples

Note: The below samples are from a Pixel 6 Pro. Because the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro have the same primary shooter and processing package, there isn’t any difference in image quality.

Pixel 6 Pro, main camera Pixel 6 Pro, main camera Pixel 6 Pro, main camera pixel 6 pro sample Pixel 6 Pro main camera, "Long Exposure" Pixel 6 Pro main camera

Performance

The Pixel 6 and Pixel 6a are powered by the same in-house Tensor SoC. Although not quite as powerful as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, the Tensor is still a capable chipset that delivers flagship-level CPU and GPU performance. It features an octa-core CPU setup consisting of two Cortex-X1 cores, two Cortex-A76 cores, and four Cortex-A55 cores. In addition, the Tensor also has several other components for machine learning and image processing tasks, such as a dedicated Tensor Processing Unit, a low-power Context Hub, a Titan M2 security chip, and an image signal processor (ISP).

Both phones are susceptible to heating and thermal throttling when playing graphics-intensive games such as Genshin Impact for extended periods.

Although both phones have similar horsepower, the Pixel 6a performs worse than the Pixel 6 in real-world use. This is mainly because the Pixel 6a packs less RAM (6GB Vs. 8GB). In our review, we found that the phone struggled to keep apps in memory for a long time and would sometime even kill apps that are actively in use when there’s not much room. Furthermore, due to the 60Hz refresh rate, the Pixel 6a will not feel as smooth and fluid as the Pixel 6, which can reach 90Hz.

All in all, the Pixel 6 is superior in terms of day-to-day performance, thanks to extra memory and a higher refresh rate display. The Pixel 6a is not a bad performer per se, but don’t expect to perform it like a true flagship smartphone.

As for configurations, the Pixel 6a only comes in a single variant which packs 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Meanwhile, the Pixel 6 gives you two options: 8GB/128GB and 8GB/256GB.

Battery life, fingerprint reader, and more

The Pixel 6 packs a 4,614mAh battery, while the Pixel 6a has a slightly smaller 4,410mAh cell. You can expect both phones to deliver an all-day battery life, though the Pixel 6a may fare a little better thanks to its smaller screen size and lower screen refresh rate. While there’s not a huge difference in the battery capacity, charging speed is a different story. The Pixel 6 offers 30W fast charging compared to the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging. Another notable difference is that the Pixel 6 offers wireless charging support while the Pixel 6a doesn’t.

The Pixel 6 and Pixel 6a both come equipped with an in-display optical fingerprint scanner. This is an area where the Pixel 6a is actually superior to the flagship Pixel 6. Google did the right thing by giving the Pixel 6a a new fingerprint scanner, which is quick and more reliable than the Pixel 6’s finicky fingerprint scanner.

On the software front, both phones run a near-stock version of Android 12 with Pixel Launcher and Material You theme. Software support is also similar, with Google promising up to three years of OS updates and five years of security updates.

Google Pixel 6a vs Google Pixel 6: Which one should you buy?

One of the biggest draws of the Pixel A series has always been that you can get the same camera hardware as the regular Pixel smartphone for less. That’s not the case with the Pixel 6a. Instead of the new 50MP GN1 sensor that’s inside the Pixel 6, the Pixel 6a recycles the old 12.2MP sensor that’s been around for many generations. It’s still a capable shooter that gets the job done, but there’s nothing extraordinary about the overall camera performance. It’s better than many other similarly priced mid-rangers on the market. But in case you were expecting massive camera improvements over the Pixel 5a and Pixel 4a, you’re going to be disappointed. It’s also a shame that the Pixel 6a still uses a 60Hz display while almost every other phone in the mid-range segment now has a high refresh rate display. The Pixel 6a retains the same flagship SoC as the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro, but it’s not as good of a selling point as one would think. Other mid-range SoCs will give you similar levels of performance, and the complete experience that you would get out of a similarly priced phone would be better rounded.

    Google Pixel 6
    The Google Pixel 6 offers a 90Hz AMOLED display, Tensor chipset, and a powerful camera system.
    Google Pixel 6
    The Google Pixel 6a offers a 6.1-inch display, Tensor SoC, and a capable cameras at an affordable price.

If you can spend $150 extra, the Pixel 6 is a better buy, in our opinion, as it offers a higher refresh rate display, better everyday performance, and superior cameras. And the phone regularly sees discounts and price slashes, so you can grab it for even less. In our eyes, the $150 or lesser price difference is worth making the jump for, especially since you get camera hardware that remains more capable for longer.

But if you’re on a tight budget and want a phone with a capable camera and clean software, then you can’t go wrong with the Pixel 6a. It’s a great device and one that is great value-for-money too. But it just can’t beat the value proposition that the Pixel 6 brings to the table.

The post Google Pixel 6a vs Google Pixel 6: Which Google phone should you prefer as your next device? appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/cNHOxJy
via IFTTT

Acer Swift 3 (2022) review: A solid mainstream laptop, but it needs a bigger battery

The Acer Swift 3 is one of the mainstays in the company’s laptop lineup, and the 2022 model brings some very welcome improvements that make this a great laptop for most people. It’s got plenty of performance with Intel’s P series, up to a Quad HD display, and – potentially my favorite aspect –  a very good webcam that makes it ideal for remote learning or work.

It’s not without its flaws, with battery life being one of the downsides of having such a powerful CPU and a sharp display, but if you don’t need to be away from an outlet for too long, it’s a great device. I also would have loved to see Windows Hello facial recognition support, but that’s far from a necessity.

For what it offers, the Acer Swift 3 is competitively priced, and it does come in a sleek package that makes it a laptop you can take anywhere and not get any weird looks. It’s not a laptop that will blow your mind in any specific way, but it covers all the basic needs you’d expect and it does it very well.

    Acer Swift 3 (2022)
    The Acer Swift 3 is a mainstream laptop with high-performance Intel processors and up to a Quad HD display.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

Navigate this review:

Acer Swift 3: Pricing and availability

  • The Acer Swift 3 launched in various markets, including the United States and Europe, in June, starting at $849.99
  • The model used in this review officially costs $1,129.99

Acer announced the Swift 3 (2022) in March, but it took a few months for it to launch, with an official launch in June. Officially, the laptop starts at $849.99, but you can actually find some models for lower than that if you look around. Some models are available from Acer directly, but mostly you’ll find it at Amazon and other retailers as well.

Angled view of the Acer Swift 3 on a wooden table

The model Acer provided for this review is a high-end configuration (see the spec sheet below), and it’s officially priced at $999.99. You can save some money by going with a smaller 512GB SSD, which is still plenty of storage space.

Acer Swift 3: Specs

CPU Intel Core i7-1260P (12 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.7GHz, 18MB cache)
Graphics Integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics (96 EUs)
Display 14-inch IPS, Quad HD (2560 x 1440), 210 DPI, 100% sRGB, up to 300 nits, Acer ComfyView
Body 321 x 210.8 x 15.9 mm, 1.25kg
Memory 16GB LPDDR4x-4266
Storage 1TB NVMe PCIe SSD
Battery 56Wh battery
Ports
  • 2 x Thunderbolt 4/USB4 Type-C ports (40Gbps)
  • 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A (one always on for charging)
  • 1 x HDMI 2.1
  • 1 x microSD card reader
Audio Dual stereo speakers with DTS Audio, Acer TrueHarmony
Dual array microphones with Acer Purified.Voice
Connectivity Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i
Bluetooth 5.2
Camera 1080p Full HD MIPI webcam with Temporal Noise Reduction
Color Silver
Material Aluminum
OS Windows 11 Home
Price $1,129.99

Design: The Acer Swift 3 looks like a laptop

  • The Acer Swift 3 is available in three colors, but silver is the most common
  • It weighs roughly 2.75lbs, which is fairly light for an aluminum laptop

As far as looks go, the Acer Swift 3 is an incredibly mundane product, at least in the variant that I got. Acer announced it to be coming in three colorways, but silver is really the only one I’ve been able to find, and it certainly seems to be the more widespread option. It makes sense, because silver laptops are the most popular, but it just doesn’t stand out at all, which is something I find myself wishing more laptops would do.

Angled rear view of the Acer Swift 3 with the lid open at 60 degrees

But just because it doesn’t look unique, that doesn’t mean it’s bad at all. The laptop is made from aluminum, which gives it a very premium feeling all around. While it’s subdued, it looks clean and sleek. The only thing that gives it away as a cheaper device is the plastic bezel around the display. And while the laptop is mostly made of metal, it still feels very light, weighing around 2.75lbs and measuring just 15.9mm thin. Picking up the laptop feels effortless, and I can easily imagine carrying this around in a backpack without much of an issue.

Aside from being somewhat generic in terms of how it looks, the only thing I can really point out with this design is that the hinge is just a little bit too stiff, and opening the lid with one hand is difficult. That’s far from a huge deal, though, and I suspect part of why that happens is that the laptop is designed to lift the base when you open the hinge, putting the keyboard at a more comfortable angle and improving airflow. That’s a fine compromise in my opinion.

Left-side view of the Acer Swift 3 showing its ports

Taking a look around the laptop, you’ll find two Thunderbolt 4 ports on the left side, along with one USB Type-A port and one HDMI port. I do wish these ports were a bit more spread out, as you might have some trouble plugging in peripherals with both Thunderbolt ports at the same time since they’re so close together. This is a side note, but my review unit was bumped before getting to me, so that’s why it looks like the lid is curving on the right side of the picture above.

Right-side view of the Acer Swift 3 showing its ports

The left side only has one USB Type-A port, a headphone jack, and a Kensington lock slot. I just feel like one of the Thunderbolt ports could have been on this side to even things out a bit more, but it’s not a big deal.

Display and webcam: 1080p webcams are finally standard

  • The display now comes in up to Quad HD resolution, so it’s much sharper
  • The webcam has been upgraded to 1080p and it looks great

The Acer Swift 3 comes with a 14-inch display with a 16:9 aspect ratio, which is pretty standard for the series. Of course, a taller display would be nice, but in this price range, this isn’t unexpected, and 16:9 displays still do the job just fine.

Close-up view of the Acer Swift 3 display

The 2022 model comes with a big upgrade, which is the inclusion of a Quad HD panel for the first time. You can still opt for the Full HD display and I think you’ll be just fine, but if you want something a little sharper, it’s nice to know you have the option now. I do think you have to weigh that against the cost in battery life that comes from the higher resolution. While it is sharper, I don’t think most people will notice a difference, and the Full HD display will use less power, which is probably something you need to consider with this laptop, as we’ll discuss later.

Screenshot of display tests on the Acer Swift 3 showing color gamut coverage

Aside from the resolution, the two panel options are similar. They reach up to 300 nits of brightness (according to Acer), which is more than enough for indoor use, though you might have some trouble working under direct sunlight. Acer also claims the display cover 100% of the sRGB color space, and based on our testing, that seems to hold up. It also covers 70% of NTSC, and 76% of Adobe RGB and DCI-P3.

Screenshot of display tests on the Acer Swift 3 showing maximum brightness, contrast levels, and white points

I actually felt the display may have been a little warm during my usage, but our testing actually shows it’s a little on the cool side. The white point stays fairly consistent at different brightness levels, and the contrast ratio peaked at 1420:1, which is a pretty solid score. Plus, our testing actually shows that brightness can go up to just over 340 nits, which is noticeably higher than Acer’s claims and definitely nice to see.

It's great to have a webcam this good.

For sound, Acer is using a pair of stereo down-firing speakers, which is fairly standard for this price range. They sound alright and they can get decently loud, though they don’t particularly stand out for their amazing quality. They’ll do the job fine, but they could also be better.

One of my favorite things about this laptop is right above that display. The laptop now has a 1080p webcam, and out of all the upgrades Acer could have made with this year’s iteration, I’m glad this was it. I’m always really happy to see high-quality webcams in a laptop, and I seem to be one of the few people that felt that way well before the past two years forced a lot more people to work remotely. I’m on video calls almost every day, and it’s great to have a webcam this good built-in. You can see a sample in the photo below.

Camera sample from the Acer Swift 3 laptop webcam. It depicts a man sitting on a chair with furniture behind him.

Of course, it’s still a laptop webcam, so you shouldn’t expect the world from it, and it definitely looks very soft. But in good lighting conditions, you’re going to look pretty good with this camera, and at worst, it’s still solid compared to most webcams of the past. I even prefer it to the 1080p webcam on the Lenovo Yoga 6 I reviewed recently, and that was already pretty good.

Keyboard and touchpad: It gets the job done just fine

  • Typing on the keyboard feels fine, though there are better keyboards out there
  • The touchpad is decently large and works well

Talking about keyboards is something where the least you have to say, the better it generally is. The Acer Swift 3 is totally fine to type on, and I would say that’s enough praise, but it’s not the best keyboard out there. It took some getting used to coming from my desktop keyboard (of course), but I didn’t really have any major issues after a couple of hours. However, when testing this alongside the Lenovo ThinkBook 13s Gen 4 (that’s another review I have coming soon), it definitely became noticeable how much more comfortable Lenovo’s laptop feels to type on. The keys just feel more comfortable to press, while the Acer Swift 3 can feel a bit more shallow and it feels harder when it bottoms out.

Overhead view of the keyboard on the Acer Swift 3

But like I said, the keyboard on the Acer Swift 3 is totally fine, and it’s backlit, too, which is certainly welcome if you often work in dark environments. I will say, however, that the backlight is a little uneven, and because it’s so similar in color to the keys themselves, it can sometimes be hard to make out certain symbols on some of the keys, particularly during the day. You can work around that by just turning off the backlight, which also saves you a bit of battery, so it’s not a huge deal. An ambient light sensor might have helped here, turning off the backlight when there’s more light around you.

One thing I appreciate is the power button blends with the keyboard itself and Acer built the fingerprint sensor into it. That’s one of the big upgrades from past models, which had a fingerprint sensor near the touchpad which frankly looked kind of ugly. Now, it looks great, and the fingerprint sensor reads your fingerprint as soon as you press the power button, so it can sign you in to Windows right away when you get to the lock screen.

Close-up view of the power button on the Acer Swift 3

The touchpad itself is also about as good as you could want it to be. I can confirm that the annoying clicking noise I heard with my initial hands-on unit was just a result of pre-production hardware, and everything works great here, and it feels good to use. Again, this is the kind of thing where the least you say, the better it generally is, and I really have nothing negative to point out in this regard.

Performance: Intel 28W processors are fast, but battery life isn’t great

  • It’s a very fast laptop thanks to Intel P-series processors
  • Battery life suffers from that performance increase and the Quad HD display

While I did go hands-on with the Acer Swift 3 and Swift 5 earlier this year, this is the first time I’m really coming to grips with testing performance and battery life on a device with Intel’s P-series processors. These new processors have a 28W TDP, and they’re clearly in existence to give Intel a performance advantage over the Apple M1 and M2. After all, Intel used to make 28W processors exclusively for specific MacBook models, so now that Apple has moved on, it makes sense for them to be available on Windows machines.

  Acer Swift 3 (2022)
Intel Core i7-1260P
Surface Pro 8
Intel Core i7-1185G7
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 7
Intel Core i7-1260P
PCMark 10 5,318 4,988 5,168
3DMark: Time Spy 1,830 1,852 1,458
Cinebench 1,661 / 9,351 1,438 / 5,423 1,375 / 6,831
Geekbench 1,729 / 9,594 1,431 / 5,505 1,419 / 6,915
CrossMark 1,795 / 1,690 / 1,897 / 1,824 1,523 / 1,417 / 1,763 / 1,218

My unit comes with an Intel Core i7-1260P, and that means it has 12 cores and 16 threads, making for a very fast laptop across the board. Looking at the graphs below, you can see there’s a big leap in performance compared to laptops with last-gen Intel processors with 15W, and it also seems to perform better than some other laptops with the same processor. It’s all about cooling, because a lot of laptops that have been upgraded to 28W processors didn’t necessarily make enough changes to keep those CPUs running cool. They generate a lot more heat than 15W models, so using the same thermal design doesn’t really work.

Intel P-series burns through battery much more quickly.

This aligns with my personal experience, as I never found myself wanting more performance. Everything runs as smoothly as you could want it to, and multi-tasking isn’t a problem at all, at least with 16GB of RAM. 8GB should still be fine for most people, but if you like having a lot of browser tabs open, that’s one thing you’ll want to consider.

The problem is that with nearly double the TDP, the Intel P-series burns through battery much more quickly. If a laptop like the Acer Swift 3 gets these new processors and there isn’t an accompanying increase in battery size (which there isn’t), battery life is going to suffer. It’s varied a bit for me, but usually, battery life on the Acer Swift 3 hangs around 3 and a half hours, which is barely enough to last me through a morning at work. At best, during a lighter day, I got 4 hours and 11 minutes out of it, and at worst, just around 3 hours when I left the brightness set to 100% for an extended period. It’s really not great if you need to be away from an outlet all day.

Front view of the Acer Swift 3 displaying the Windows 11 default desktop

As I’ve mentioned, this is also a Quad HD display and that definitely contributes to the worse battery life. If you want it to last longer, I’d recommend getting the Full HD panel instead. I should also note that I did turn off display power savings in the Intel Graphics Command Center. This is a feature that changes the brightness of the display depending on the content being shown, so the display dims for darker images. I turned it off because it becomes very apparent when you switch from a webpage with dark mode to one without it, and it takes a couple of seconds for it to be comfortable to read. Otherwise, I used the default power settings, I had the keyboard backlight turned on, and display brightness was usually set to around 30% to 50%.

Should you buy the Acer Swift 3?

With the 2022 edition of the Acer Swift 3, we definitely get some major improvements from previous models, with options for a sharper screen, a much better webcam, and great performance, all wrapped in a premium-feeling and lightweight design, even if it’s a little boring to me personally.

You should buy the Acer Swift 3 if:

  • You want a great-performing laptop that isn’t overly expensive
  • The 1080p webcam is something you’ll be using often
  • You want something that’s lightweight while still feeling solid

You shouldn’t buy the Acer Swift 3 if:

  • You plan to use it away from an outlet for a full day
  • The 16:9 aspect ratio feels out of date to you
  • You’re looking for something that stands out from the crowd

It really falls short in terms of battery life, which might defeat the point of a laptop depending on who you are. If your usage involves being away from an outlet for a whole day, this won’t be the laptop for you. You’ll either need to look for a bigger battery or a PC that’s still using U-series processors, like the Lenovo Yoga 6 Gen 7 I reviewed a few weeks ago.

    Acer Swift 3 (2022)
    The Acer Swift 3 is a mainstream laptop with high-performance Intel processors and up to a Quad HD display.

      Features:

      Pros:

      Cons:

The post Acer Swift 3 (2022) review: A solid mainstream laptop, but it needs a bigger battery appeared first on XDA.



from XDA https://ift.tt/7Ek2bx1
via IFTTT